Paul W. Frields さんは書きました: > If the Docs Project is able to complete a transition to Publican for > the release notes for Fedora 10, many of our language codes will > change to ISO standards. This includes moving from en_US to en-US, as > in "Release_Notes-en-US.txt". > > It would probably be good if any tools used to spin or release the > distribution get updated to support both of these options. I would > suggest shifting them to use the ISO standard, en-US, first and the > try falling back to en_US. That way, if we fail utterly and have to > drop back to the old way of doing business, the results will still > land properly. I've got a favor to ask. Please make Japanese as ja-JP, not ja as current.

Here are the proposed renames. I'm not an expert, and some codes would make more sense without a country-qualifier I guess (country qualifier is ISO-wise optional).

bn_IN -> bn-IN ca -> ca-ES cs -> cs-CZ da -> da-DK de -> de-DE el -> el-GR es -> es-ES fi -> fi-FI fr -> fr-FR gu -> gu-IN he -> he-IL hi_IN -> hi-IN hr -> hr-HR hu -> hu-HU id -> id-ID it -> it-IT ja -> ja-JP ms -> ms-MY nb -> nb-NO nl -> nl-NL pa -> pa-IN pl -> pl-PL pt_BR -> pt-BR pt -> pt-PT ru -> ru-RU sk -> sk-SK sr -> sr-RS sr_Latn -> sr_Latn-RS sv -> sv-SE ta -> ta-IN uk -> uk-UA zh_CN -> zh-CN zh_TW -> zh-TW

----- "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:01:07PM +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote: > >> Paul W. Frields さんは書きました: >> >>> If the Docs Project is able to complete a transition to Publican >>> > for > >>> the release notes for Fedora 10, many of our language codes will >>> change to ISO standards. This includes moving from en_US to en-US, >>> > as > >>> in "Release_Notes-en-US.txt". >>> >>> It would probably be good if any tools used to spin or release the >>> distribution get updated to support both of these options. I >>> > would > >>> suggest shifting them to use the ISO standard, en-US, first and >>> > the > >>> try falling back to en_US. That way, if we fail utterly and have >>> > to > >>> drop back to the old way of doing business, the results will still >>> land properly. >>> >> I've got a favor to ask. >> Please make Japanese as ja-JP, not ja as current. >> > Asgeir is working on updating the language list to the proper ISO > codes now, I believe. That would certainly include ja-JP! :-) > Here are the proposed renames. I'm not an expert, and some codes would make more sense without a country-qualifier I guess (country qualifier is ISO-wise optional). bn_IN -> bn-IN ca -> ca-ES cs -> cs-CZ da -> da-DK de -> de-DE el -> el-GR es -> es-ES fi -> fi-FI fr -> fr-FR gu -> gu-IN he -> he-IL hi_IN -> hi-IN hr -> hr-HR hu -> hu-HU id -> id-ID it -> it-IT ja -> ja-JP ms -> ms-MY nb -> nb-NO nl -> nl-NL pa -> pa-IN pl -> pl-PL pt_BR -> pt-BR pt -> pt-PT ru -> ru-RU sk -> sk-SK sr -> sr-RS sr_Latn -> sr_Latn-RS sv -> sv-SE ta -> ta-IN uk -> uk-UA zh_CN -> zh-CN zh_TW -> zh-TW cheers, asgeir -- Fedora-trans-list mailing list Fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list

It would probably be good if any tools used to spin or release the distribution get updated to support both of these options. I would suggest shifting them to use the ISO standard, en-US, first and the try falling back to en_US. That way, if we fail utterly and have to drop back to the old way of doing business, the results will still land properly.