Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-29)
by Marcela Mašláňová
WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC.
== Topic ==
* Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core
Votes on mailing list were fifty fifty, so we should probably decided
what's the best approach.
* Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground?
* feature request - dnf plugin should be able to block view of some
copr repositories in Playground?
9 years, 11 months
Fwd: Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core?
by Miroslav Suchý
Dear working group,
since various devels have various opinions. I would like to ask you to discuss this on your next meeting.
For reasoning and pros and cons see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516
Please put your conclusion in this BZ.
Mirek Suchy
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Copr and Playground plugin part of dnf-plugins-core?
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:29:15 +0200
From: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com>
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Organization: Red Hat, Registered Address: Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic,
Registered in Brno under identification number CZ27690016
To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516
Jiri asked for removing Copr (and Playground) DNF plugin out of dnf-plugins-core.
Since this is not technical but merely political question I would like to ask wider audience:
Put your voice here please:
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=5358d77de4b06a67c5b08e05
If there will be significant votes for one option, I would do what most of you wish.
Otherwise I will forward it to Fesco for decision.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
9 years, 12 months
Playground DNF plugin
by Miroslav Suchý
Hi,
I created first prototype of Playground repo (you know - release early...).
The playground repo is just set of Copr repositories. I.e. some Copr
projects can have attribute "playground" set to true (currently no
interface, only directly in DB). I choosed randomly several projects and
set the flag to true.
There is an API call to get list of those projects:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/api/playground/list/
(currently undocumented, because I plan to make some changes).
I wrote DNF plugin (based on Copr DNF plugin). You can test it by:
curl
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/akozumpl/dnf-plugins-core/master/plugin...
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/dnf-plugins/copr.py
and you can do:
dnf playground enable
which will enable all Copr project, which are marked as part of
Playground and store them in
/etc/yum.repos.d/_playground_<owner>_<projectname>.repo
and:
dnf playground upgrade
which will fetch new repos (by removing all old repos and fetch all
playground repos).
and:
dnf playground disable
which will delete all /etc/yum.repos.d/_playground_*.repo
As I said, this is first prototype (although functional) and it have
some glitches. But you can get the idea.
Is this the path we want to follow? Questions? Comments?
Mirek Suchy
9 years, 12 months
Deliverables and release engineering changes for Fedora.Next
by Jaroslav Reznik
Hi!
As it seems, Fedora.Next and product planning leads also to changes
how Fedora is produced and how it's going to be distributed to our
users.
For this, we need to collect product deliverables, so needed changes
for release engineering can be planned (and implemented) and as I was
talking to Dennis, we're are currently blocked on it.
I created rel-eng ticket - WGs, please, try to sum up required changes
there (in consumable way), so we have it in one place (for possible
overlaps in requirements etc).
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5891
Currently, Alpha Change Deadline is planned for no earlier than
2014-07-22, it's not as far as it sounds, especially if changes
in releng are needed. So let's try to work this out as soon as
possible.
I suppose, in the end, FESCo should approve requested changes in
product deliverables. So once requirements are collected, I'll
create (yet another) ticket for FESCo. Or even better - as Cloud
did - Change proposal would be the best solution, even after the
submission deadline.
(Sorry for cross-posting;-).
Thanks
Jaroslav
9 years, 12 months
Question for enabling playground repository
by Miroslav Suchý
I am creating prototype of playground repository and have one question.
When user will be going to enable Playground repository, he should get some question with some warning.
When enabling Copr repository you will get:
>You are going to enable Copr repository. Please note that this repository is not
>part of Fedora distribution and may have various quality. Fedora distribution
>have no power over this repository and can not enforce some quality or security
>level.
>Please do not file bug reports about this packages in Fedora Bugzilla.
>In case of problems you should contact owner of this repository.
>
>Do you want to continue? [y/N]:
Can somebody with better literacy proficiency than me suggest some similar paragraph for enabling Playground repository?
Thanks in advance
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
10 years
