Image naming on Env & Stacks meeting
by Honza Horak
Hi Scott (and others),
we touched a topic about docker images naming (and possibly tags)
conventions on centos meeting today. It seems users will benefit from
having similar conventions in centos and fedora on docker hub, so they
can easily identify images that are supposed to work the same.
We may talk about it tomorrow on Env & Stacks meeting, which will start
at 17:00 UTC (#fedora-meeting-2). Does it seem like a good idea? Are you
able to make it?
Honza
8 years, 6 months
FPC ticket for building for multiple versions of a language stack?
by Nick Coghlan
Hi folks,
My Google-fu is failing me, so I'm asking to see if anyone else has
the relevant link: I recall seeing a proposal a while back (from
Slavek, IIRC) to support running a spec file multiple times with a
different target location each time (but still having a default
location used in a "normal" RPM build).
This wasn't about SCLs, it was about situations like building for
python 2 + python 3 + pypy + jython, or for the multiple Python 3
stacks in EPEL. The general idea was that packaging for multiple
runtimes shouldn't be as difficult as it currently is.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan(a)gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
8 years, 6 months
Recommendations for image assembly
by Nick Coghlan
Hi folks,
I've recently had a few conversations with folks that were wanting to
know "what about non-RPM packaging formats?" in relation to the
software component pipeline.
My answer to that is "use source-to-image to layer non-RPM components
atop lower level images assembled from RPMs", but that's not really
written down anywhere public.
Accordingly, while it likely isn't the right long term home, I started
a page for "Image Assembly Recommendations" at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Projects/ImageAssemblyRecom...
The idea there is for us to start capturing more about how folks can
use the *output* of the software component pipeline, both standalone
and in combination with other non-RPM bits, to create larger binary
artifacts.
Most of those are still "built RPMs in -> binary artifact out", but
layered images are the one case that aren't necessarily purely about
assembly of already built components: source-to-image may be used to
bring in source dependencies using language specific tools (maven,
npm, bower, pip, gem, cpan, composer, etc), as well as application
source code directly from git repos.
While my initial write-up talks specifically about how each kind of
artifact is likely to be built in Fedora, it likely makes more sense
from an Envs & Stacks perspective to talk about them more generally in
a way that's also useful to Fedora remixes and derivatives, and then
point to Fedora's usage as an example.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan(a)gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
8 years, 7 months
Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-09-24)
by Honza Horak
WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* Fedora dockerfiles -- versions, size, more involvement from E&S
* Software Collections use cases in semi-containerized world
Honza
8 years, 7 months
Re: rolekit, docker and some image (like database)
by Stephen Gallagher
> On Sep 14, 2015, at 4:42 AM, Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Quoting Petr Hracek (2015-09-11 12:36:27)
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> we have talked with Honza Horak and Radek Vokal that we should start
>> with a bit proof of concept or demo.
>>
>> I would like to play with it a bit.
>> Do you have any hints?
>> What OS shall I use?
>> Is it enough Fedora or shall I use RHEL?
>> Are there any guides how to run rolekit together with docker?
>>
>> I will use a packages available either on Fedora or on RHEL.
>>
>> I will write a report after my tests of course.
>>
>> I think that we should have a start point, therefore I decide it to do it.
>>
>> --
>> Petr Hracek
>> Software Engineer
>> Developer Experience
>> Red Hat, Inc
>> Mob: +420777056169
>> email: phracek(a)redhat.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> env-and-stacks mailing list
>> env-and-stacks(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks
>
> I think that we should get status of rolekit first.
>
> Stephen, what's the status of rolekit development? Are there any docs? I
> couldn't find pretty much anything:
>
> https://github.com/sgallagher/rolekit/blame/master/README.md#L77
>
We have been woefully late on docs, but I've got some new updates awaiting review that you can view in the meantime here:
https://github.com/sgallagher/rolekit/blob/documentation/README.md
Also, the man pages in Fedora are fairly comprehensive about the available options.
> ~~
> Tomáš Tomeček
> Software Engineer
> Developer Experience
> UTC+2 (CEST)
8 years, 7 months
No agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting -> no meeting? (2015-09-17)
by Honza Horak
WG meeting should be at 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 19:00 Brno, 13:00 Boston,
2:00+1d Tokyo, 3:00+1d Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
However, there is no agenda proposed.. If there is something we should
cover on the meeting, let me know asap... otherwise we can skip this week.
Honza
8 years, 7 months
rolekit, docker and some image (like database)
by Petr Hracek
Hi folks,
we have talked with Honza Horak and Radek Vokal that we should start
with a bit proof of concept or demo.
I would like to play with it a bit.
Do you have any hints?
What OS shall I use?
Is it enough Fedora or shall I use RHEL?
Are there any guides how to run rolekit together with docker?
I will use a packages available either on Fedora or on RHEL.
I will write a report after my tests of course.
I think that we should have a start point, therefore I decide it to do it.
--
Petr Hracek
Software Engineer
Developer Experience
Red Hat, Inc
Mob: +420777056169
email: phracek(a)redhat.com
8 years, 7 months
Fedora Developer Portal - UX point of view
by Petr Hracek
Hi Mairin,
sorry for bother you with this item but I would like to ask
you If you can thing about how Fedora Developer Portal could look like.
I propose that skin or face for developer.fp.org can be used also for
another portals
which could be defined later on.
Or even if they are already exists.
I guess that fedoraproject.org should have a common face:)
We would like to release a first version of Fedora Developer Portal in
the middle of September
but many folks could have holidays and I guess that you too.:)
We already have a GitHub repo for mockups [1] and feel free to use it.
I would like to really thank you for your time and support.
[1] https://github.com/developer-portal/mockups
Greetings
Petr
--
Petr Hracek
Software Engineer
Developer Experience
Red Hat, Inc
Mob: +420777056169
email: phracek(a)redhat.com
8 years, 7 months
