On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:29:05PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Now that I've thought about it some more I don't like that
plan that
much anymore, as then it's not possible to differentiate if people have
the old or the new package installed. Sure, that shouldn't be many
people yet, but nevertheless it could create problems.
The reason for not doing so were that one would fork all specfiles.
Opinions? Just ignore that? Or simply do a script-build mass rebuild
of
EPEL5 with increased %release?
I'd say ignore it. The current users of EPEL are on this list.
We'll have also other issues to resolve (like qt4 on EPEL4 > qt4 on
RHEL5, and if we check we'll probably find more) and we need to keep a
rawhide attitude (aka flexibility) otherwise we'll have to start using
epochs before launching.
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net