On 28.10.2008 12:53, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:26:24PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> A EPEL SIG member is somebody that cares of EPEL as a whole; somebody
> who helps making EPEL better/who does work beyond the packaging level.
How do you distinguish practically both kind of contributors?
I personnally think that this distinction isn't really meaningfull,
For us that's true. But for the SIG members it's something different;
they can feel special if they are part of a SIG, and that might help
getting them more involved to help bring EPEL forward.
I'd leave the SIG stuff in place as it is, as it doesn't do any harm but
might help. References to the EPEL SIG and it's Steering Committee might
also exist in other parts of the wiki and might be important for the
government modell. FESCo iirc put "driving EPEL" in the hands of the
EPEL SIG and its steering committee.
CU
knurd