Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 01/31/2018 10:53 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> So we have a problem with what is the canonical place for SCL's. I was
> going from
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/ which just says x86_64.
Even just getting x86_64 devtoolset into the potential buildroot for
EPEL would be hugely helpful to me, because that's all chromium cares
about right now.
I filed a pull request to update mock-core-configs:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/159
If anyone here knows relevant folks on the SCL team who can
provide some input on the preferred/canonical repository
URLs (or any other issues with that PR), it would be great.
I tend to think that the mock configs we ship should use
whatever URLs the centos-release-scl{,-rh} packages use.
That's what end-users would see if they wanted to rebuild
packages outside of mock. If those change we can always
update them in mock-core-configs to match.
--
Todd
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.