On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:54:13 +0100
Dave Love <d.love(a)liverpool.ac.uk> wrote:
I was reviewing some documentation which includes:
Redhat for example has a very optimal tool chain which they use for
their Enterprise product line and it is not available to other
distributions (or rebuilds) and thus their resulting binaries and
libraries have been more performant then other Linux distributions
we have tested.
Can someone say if that's correct? I assumed building was done
similarly to koji.
(I could experiment, but it seems better to ask where someone
presumably knows, assuming they can say.)
I don't know (I work for Red Hat, but am not directly involved with
internal builds), but I am highly skeptical of the claim.
That said, why not ask whoever wrote that doc for some kind of
citation or proof? They say something about testing, so perhaps they
have some proof of this?
kevin