[EPEL-devel] Re: gcc-gnat

Thanks Stephen and Florian for your input. It's now clear that a package that only adds the "missing pieces" won't work.

Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

1. Make a non-default module which contained all the rebuilt binaries

needed to make gcc-gnat and other tools work (some languages also need other utilities rebuilt to work). 2. Make an SCL which contains all these. 3. Make a set of rpms which installed gcc<name> in all the same places as gcc but didn't collide

The module option seems like it would be easiest to use for the users, and would also avoid the risk that one program might invoke the wrong build of another program.

Björn Persson