2011/5/27 Volker Fröhlich <volker27(a)gmx.at>:
Dear list reader!
There is no xerces-c for PPC in RHEL 6. It builds fine, nevertheless, so I
volunteered to maintain it for PPC in EPEL 6. I took exactly the same spec file
as RHEL 6 uses, but bumped the release, as I changed the spec to build for
this exclusive architecture.
Hmmm I am wondering. For things that aren't in an OS but may show up
there.. should we unbump the release number so that RHEL updates win
any war? As in if it is xerces-c-3.1459-8.ppc the EPEL one should be
xerces-c-3.1459-7.9.ppc ?
EPEL packages shall not cause any trouble in RHEL. Could the
different release
number cause any?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696367
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=243946
Kind regards,
Volker
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren