Dennis Gilmore wrote :
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 10:23:43 am Matthias Saou wrote:
> Michael E Brown wrote :
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 09:17:09AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > >Hi all!
> > > >
> > > >Now that I've thought about it some more I don't like that
plan that
> > > >much anymore, as then it's not possible to differentiate if
people
> > > > have the old or the new package installed. Sure, that shouldn't
be
> > > > many people yet, but nevertheless it could create problems.
> > > >
> > > >Opinions? Just ignore that? Or simply do a script-build mass rebuild
> > > > of EPEL5 with increased %release?
> > >
> > > Script release bump works for me.
> >
> > Works for me as well. Please very clearly communicate what you are going
> > to be doing in a new thread once it has been decided.
>
> Doesn't work that well for me, since I use a lot of identical spec
> files across distros and releases. Could work if the devel branches
> of my packages were also bumped, as otherwise the next devel update I
> would then "backport" to EL5 would be an invalid build (same EVR as
> the bumped rebuild).
>
> Matthias
rebuild would happen with a .1 appended to your next build will be ok
OK, if it's not "increased %release" (as it was written), but a
".1"
appended to the release, then it does also work for me :-)
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages :
http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6
Load : 11.40 11.98 10.89