On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:48:15 +0100
Dave Love <d.love(a)liverpool.ac.uk> wrote:
Kevin Fenzi <kevin-+bl/7iUgRMUAvxtiuMwx3w(a)public.gmane.org>
writes:
> I don't know (I work for Red Hat, but am not directly involved with
> internal builds), but I am highly skeptical of the claim.
Likewise (currently).
> That said, why not ask whoever wrote that doc for some kind of
> citation or proof? They say something about testing, so perhaps they
> have some proof of this?
It was deduced experimentally during early -- for some value of early
-- CentOS development. I'll suggest the reference to Red Hat is
changed.
It could be important to know if it was correct now, which was a
reason for asking here. I assume that rebuilds are essentially the
same as RHEL (modulo reproducible builds) when it comes to things
like reporting bugs and issues relevant to EPEL development.
Specifically I assume they won't potentially have different code
generation bugs.
I would assume that to be correct yes, although I suppose you could ask
on centos-devel or the like to get their take.
kevin