2009/3/29 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:41:20 +0300
Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy(a)nobugconsulting.ro> wrote:
> I'd suggest:
> - pushes occur once per month and take into account the following 3
> rules: 1. at least one month in testing, as we have now (unless
> security fix) 2. push to stable if karma reaches a level N>0 ("N" to
> be defined) and time in testing >= 4 weeks
> 3. push to stable if karma >=0 and the package was in testing "long
> enough" (not less than 4 weeks; maybe 12 ?)
So, this would be a slower progression than we have now, right?
Slow isn't the same thing as stable, I think we need to remember that.
And how many people are we likely to have add karma?
It seems not too used in the Fedora world, and I am sure there are
fewer EPEL users. ;)
Any other input out there?
I was thinking this too. Many package I use/maintain have a small
user-base. So, the likelyhood of Karma happening is nil. In Fedora
it doesn't happen, and in EPEL I am nearly positive it won't.
kevin
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list