From: Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 16:30
To: EPEL Development List
Subject: [EPEL-devel] Re: proposal: EPEL 8 Next
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:51 AM Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:00:42PM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> I agree with all of that. I only don't like the name. Why
EPEL 8 Next? If it
> is to be use with Stream, why don't we call it EPEL 8 Stream? I think the
> meaning of the repository would be easier to understand.
Very good question, one I asked in the meeting.
If I got the argument right, then the amount of red-tape / legal work
i> t would
take to call it epel-stream would be much higher than we want
to pay.
Many of us didn't like the name "Stream" to begin with since it is
sooo overloaded.
EPEL Upstream?
Mika