On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 06:44:50PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Bill Nottingham schrieb:
> Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora(a)leemhuis.info) said:
>> AFIACS the same as in Extras in the past: File a bug, poke Red Hat
>> maintainers (¹) and pray that it gets fixed.
>> Especially the last part is important.
>> Sorry, sound like a joke, and in parts is one, but well, on the other
>> hands that's how it roughly worked for community contributors in Extras(²).
> Sure, but it's actually a lot easier to get things fixed in Fedora,
>From my point of view it seems quite hard sometimes... But that's a
different story...
> especially if it's just 'grab a newer version'. I'm not sure I can
> convincingly come up with a business case for rebasing guile for
> RHEL 4. :)
:-)
Anyway, do you have any proposed solution for the problem at hand that
not involves replacing or disturbing pacakges from RHEL? Then I'm all
ears...
I don't know, maybe it shows that the all-frightened "don't replace"
sign paved everywhere isn't the holy grail afterall. When even one
section in Red Hat replaces packages from RHEL for LAMP ...
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net