On dom, 2013-03-17 at 10:55 -0500, inode0 wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi <
kevin@scrye.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:19:44 -0600
> > inode0 <
inode0@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Your situation probably explains most of the two large groups where
> >> either we see the same version or we see a lower version lingering in
> >> EPEL.
> >>
> >> Why not generate these lists and exclude the packages in question from
> >> the metadata built for architectures where they are included in RHEL?
> >
> > Yeah, I suppose we could hard code such a list into mash.
> >
> > I don't think the mash maintainers have time/desire to do this.
> > Would anyone else be willing to look into it?
>
> My lack of understanding the process is pretty limiting. Why in the
> world does it need to be hardcoded into anything? Surely mash can grab
> the list from a file or from the environment?!
mash is very simple. it takes the list of packages in the tag and makes