What's the plan with epel8 branching? I was fairly happy with needing to request branches manually like with did with epel7. Are we going to use the "epel8" name?
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 18:39, Orion Poplawski orion@nwra.com wrote:
What's the plan with epel8 branching? I was fairly happy with needing to request branches manually like with did with epel7. Are we going to use the "epel8" name?
That is the part I am wondering about because of modularity and arbitrary branching. Does modular branches need to be epel8-<?> or something else?
On 11/16/18 4:07 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 18:39, Orion Poplawski orion@nwra.com wrote:
What's the plan with epel8 branching? I was fairly happy with needing to request branches manually like with did with epel7. Are we going to use the "epel8" name?
That is the part I am wondering about because of modularity and arbitrary branching. Does modular branches need to be epel8-<?> or something else?
They just need to be arbitrary branches where the module config says to also make them for epel8 (in addition to whatever else they build against).
kevin
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Kevin Fenzi -
Orion Poplawski -
Stephen John Smoogen