I've a look to PHP and extensions in EL4.
We have a lot "PEAR" and PECL extensions in EPEL for EL5 which cannot go to EPEL for EL4 because of very old PHP and PEAR version.
RHEL 4 users can use packages from RHWAS (Web Application Stack 1.0) ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/RHWAS/SRPMS ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/4ES/en/RHWAS/SRPMS
We found there - php-5.1.6 (as for RHEL5) - pear-1.4.11
CentOS 4 users can use packages from centosplus repository We found there all RHWAS RPM and a lot of RPM from Fedora/EPEL (i've read some changelog to verify) http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/SRPMS/
I think the packages from EPEL-5 could easily be maintain for an EPEL-4+ repository (using RHEL + RHWAS as references).
I also think it's quite strange than CentOS repository is more complete than EPEL using only RHEL + Fedora community work...
What must we do in EPEL-4 ? Regards
On 9/3/07, Remi Collet Fedora@famillecollet.com wrote:
I've a look to PHP and extensions in EL4.
We have a lot "PEAR" and PECL extensions in EPEL for EL5 which cannot go to EPEL for EL4 because of very old PHP and PEAR version.
RHEL 4 users can use packages from RHWAS (Web Application Stack 1.0) ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/RHWAS/SRPMS ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/4ES/en/RHWAS/SRPMS
Our policy is not to step on top of RH offered materials. RHWAS is offered as a channel is RHN, if I am correct. So, I don't think we can offer the RPMs that are RHWAS. If people would like a newer stack, I guess they can move to EL4, or compile the src rpms you have linked to.
stahnma
We found there
- php-5.1.6 (as for RHEL5)
- pear-1.4.11
CentOS 4 users can use packages from centosplus repository We found there all RHWAS RPM and a lot of RPM from Fedora/EPEL (i've read some changelog to verify) http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/SRPMS/
I think the packages from EPEL-5 could easily be maintain for an EPEL-4+ repository (using RHEL + RHWAS as references).
I also think it's quite strange than CentOS repository is more complete than EPEL using only RHEL + Fedora community work...
What must we do in EPEL-4 ? Regards
epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
Michael Stahnke a écrit :
Our policy is not to step on top of RH offered materials. RHWAS is offered as a channel is RHN, if I am correct. So, I don't think we can offer the RPMs that are RHWAS.
That's not what i mean. I only say :
I think the packages from EPEL-5 could easily be maintain for an EPEL-4+ repository (using RHEL + RHWAS as references).
So building RPM for "RHEL + RHWAS" users (such as pear and pecl extensions).
Remi.
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org