On 09/29/2015 03:57 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I fully expect a release of this version within a week ...
FYI, it looks like CentOS 7 for 32-bit x86 is finally imminent.
It's probably worth noting that Springdale Linux has been available for x86 for quite a while:
https://springdale.math.ias.edu/
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:50:51AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
I fully expect a release of this version within a week ...
FYI, it looks like CentOS 7 for 32-bit x86 is finally imminent.
And in fact is out now: http://seven.centos.org/2015/10/centos-linux-7-32-bit-x86-i386-architecture-...
On 10/15/2015 07:29 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
And in fact is out now: http://seven.centos.org/2015/10/centos-linux-7-32-bit-x86-i386-architecture-...
And hopefully we'll see EPEL 7 for 32-bit x86 soon ...
On 15 October 2015 at 16:38, Ian Pilcher arequipeno@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/15/2015 07:29 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
And in fact is out now:
http://seven.centos.org/2015/10/centos-linux-7-32-bit-x86-i386-architecture-...
And hopefully we'll see EPEL 7 for 32-bit x86 soon ...
soon will be a while. There needs to be testing and possible changes to koji to support the issue of dealing with one build root coming from one source (RHEL) and another one coming from another (CentOS). The build infrastructure is under a freeze until Fedora 23 is released sometime this month and then work on this can hopefully. This may end up being a "oh look it already works! just add this config" or it could be a "OMG my eyes are melting". IN either case, I would not expect it til November/December.
On 10/16/2015 02:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
soon will be a while. There needs to be testing and possible changes to koji to support the issue of dealing with one build root coming from one source (RHEL) and another one coming from another (CentOS). The build infrastructure is under a freeze until Fedora 23 is released sometime this month and then work on this can hopefully. This may end up being a "oh look it already works! just add this config" or it could be a "OMG my eyes are melting". IN either case, I would not expect it til November/December.
Let's really hope for the former. From experience I can say that most of the packages build without any changes and a small number require a minor tweak in the spec file.
Anyways, thanks for the definitive answer Stephen, I look forward to being able to use epel on my 32 bit laptops without having to rebuild half the repo myself.
Peter
On 16/10/15 02:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 15 October 2015 at 16:38, Ian Pilcher arequipeno@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/15/2015 07:29 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
And in fact is out now:
http://seven.centos.org/2015/10/centos-linux-7-32-bit-x86-i386-architecture-...
And hopefully we'll see EPEL 7 for 32-bit x86 soon ...
soon will be a while. There needs to be testing and possible changes to koji to support the issue of dealing with one build root coming from one source (RHEL) and another one coming from another (CentOS). The build infrastructure is under a freeze until Fedora 23 is released sometime this month and then work on this can hopefully. This may end up being a "oh look it already works! just add this config" or it could be a "OMG my eyes are melting". IN either case, I would not expect it til November/December.
is it worth considering hosting these EPEL builds over at cbs.centos.org ?
On 17 October 2015 at 16:37, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 16/10/15 02:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 15 October 2015 at 16:38, Ian Pilcher arequipeno@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/15/2015 07:29 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
And in fact is out now:
http://seven.centos.org/2015/10/centos-linux-7-32-bit-x86-i386-architecture-...
And hopefully we'll see EPEL 7 for 32-bit x86 soon ...
soon will be a while. There needs to be testing and possible changes to koji to support the issue of dealing with one build root coming from one source (RHEL) and another one coming from another (CentOS). The build infrastructure is under a freeze until Fedora 23 is released sometime this month and then work on this can hopefully. This may end up being a "oh look it already works! just add this config" or it could be a "OMG my eyes are melting". IN either case, I would not expect it til November/December.
is it worth considering hosting these EPEL builds over at cbs.centos.org ?
I don't think they would be "Fedora EPEL" then because the packages wouldn't be built by koji, signed by us etc. I am not saying that such builds couldn't happen in cbs.. it just wouldn't be EPEL.
-- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On 17/10/15 23:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I don't think they would be "Fedora EPEL" then because the packages wouldn't be built by koji, signed by us etc. I am not saying that such builds couldn't happen in cbs.. it just wouldn't be EPEL.
but you are building for/against a distro that had the same origin, would people at that point care if it was Fedora EPEL or CentOS EPEL ?
- KB
On 17 October 2015 at 16:55, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 17/10/15 23:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I don't think they would be "Fedora EPEL" then because the packages wouldn't be built by koji, signed by us etc. I am not saying that such builds couldn't happen in cbs.. it just wouldn't be EPEL.
but you are building for/against a distro that had the same origin, would people at that point care if it was Fedora EPEL or CentOS EPEL ?
Yes and no.
The people who will care: 1) The developers who are branching code and using koji commands to build will care because none of the existing workflows will exist. They will also care when packages which don't work in x86_32 are trying to be built by someone else and all they get are bugs. Other workflow problems will be bugzilla vs mantis, pkgs, autokarma, [and probably 4-8 other fedora build, qa, and distribution tools]
2) Certain people who expect that all the builds are done in the same environment (even if it doesn't make any sense in this case) will care.. and will wonder what does EPEL mean if that isn't the case. This is the part which is sort of trademark dilution and sort of "we allow EPEL in our environment because of these guarantees and you broke them".
The people who will not care: 1) Most of the users who just want a bunch of packages that aren't in base CentOS-7.
- KB
-- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 17/10/15 23:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I don't think they would be "Fedora EPEL" then because the packages wouldn't be built by koji, signed by us etc. I am not saying that such builds couldn't happen in cbs.. it just wouldn't be EPEL.
but you are building for/against a distro that had the same origin, would people at that point care if it was Fedora EPEL or CentOS EPEL ?
We do. I realize that it's a silly distinction, but getting software approved that's "from RedHat" is tons easier for us than when it's "from CentOS".
Hi everybody
Now that Fedora 23 is out, do you have some precision for If/when EPEL packages will be out for Centos 7 32 bits ?
Thx
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:50:31 -0000 zikamev@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi everybody
Now that Fedora 23 is out, do you have some precision for If/when EPEL packages will be out for Centos 7 32 bits ?
Not really. I think the next plan was to look at enabling ppc64le and see how that goes, then take what we have learned from that and do i686.
kevin
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:50:31 -0000 zikamev@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi everybody
Now that Fedora 23 is out, do you have some precision for If/when EPEL packages will be out for Centos 7 32 bits ?
Not really. I think the next plan was to look at enabling ppc64le and see how that goes, then take what we have learned from that and do i686.
And I'm dealing with the process and write up of the general direction of that at the moment, was planning on sending out an email outline the initial rough plan this evening.
Peter
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Dave Johansen -
Ian Pilcher -
john tatt -
Karanbir Singh -
Kevin Fenzi -
Matthew Miller -
Peter -
Peter Robinson -
Stephen John Smoogen