On 16 September 2010 17:48, Orion Poplawski<orion(a)cora.nwra.com> wrote: > Any progress on getting fftw into EL6? Thanks! > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3916 I think we're still waiting to hear from Red Hat if there's going to be a RHEL6 equivalent of the RHEL5 "productivity" channel that provides the packages that are in the WorkStation build to the Server build, we really want to minimise any fiddling we may have to do post General Availability...

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:38:42 -0700 Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com&gt; wrote: > On 09/16/2010 10:27 AM, Mark Chappell wrote: > > On 16 September 2010 17:48, Orion Poplawski&lt;orion(a)cora.nwra.com&gt; > > wrote: > >> Any progress on getting fftw into EL6? Thanks! > >> > >> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3916 > > > > I think we're still waiting to hear from Red Hat if there's going to > > be a RHEL6 equivalent of the RHEL5 "productivity" channel that > > provides the packages that are in the WorkStation build to the > > Server build, we really want to minimise any fiddling we may have > > to do post General Availability... > > Sorry to be a pest about this, but now that RHEL 6 has been announced > do we know any more? I don't see a fftw src.rpm in 6Server, > 6Workstation, 6Client, 6ComputeNode, or in > http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6/en/source/SRPMS/. Yeah, I don't see any of the 'optional' srpms in there... and now we have 'server' 'workstation' and 'client'. ;( I'm not sure if thats intentional or some oversight, etc.

On 11/11/2010 02:36 PM, seth vidal wrote: > but they are definitely there now. So, fftw is in all but ComputeNode - so I'm assuming that it's available in the standard server channel. When will the EPEL 6 builders pull from RHEL6 final?