https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog214/index.html QGIS has adopted a LTR model similar to Firefox and 2.14 is the new LTR. I've considered doing what RedHat does with Firefox and updating the version of QGIS in EPEL with LTR releases. What is everyone's thoughts on that? Thanks, Dave
On 04/07/2016 10:33 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog214/index.html QGIS has adopted a LTR model similar to Firefox and 2.14 is the new LTR. I've considered doing what RedHat does with Firefox and updating the version of QGIS in EPEL with LTR releases. What is everyone's thoughts on that? Thanks, Dave
Yes please!! :-)
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, ~Stack~ i.am.stack@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/07/2016 10:33 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog214/index.html QGIS has adopted a LTR model similar to Firefox and 2.14 is the new LTR. I've considered doing what RedHat does with Firefox and updating the version of QGIS in EPEL with LTR releases. What is everyone's thoughts on that? Thanks, Dave
Yes please!! :-)
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/qgis-2.14.1-1.el7 Please test and report any issues. Thanks, Dave
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Dave Johansen davejohansen@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, ~Stack~ i.am.stack@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/07/2016 10:33 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
https://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/visualchangelog214/index.html QGIS has adopted a LTR model similar to Firefox and 2.14 is the new LTR. I've considered doing what RedHat does with Firefox and updating the version of QGIS in EPEL with LTR releases. What is everyone's thoughts on that? Thanks, Dave
Yes please!! :-)
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/qgis-2.14.1-1.el7 Please test and report any issues.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/qgis-2.14.1-2.el7 A fix for the incorrect dependency in qgis-grass has been pushed to testing.
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Dave Johansen -
~Stack~