Hi,
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 at 04:17, Wei, Catherine wrote: [...]
- Results of rpm -V epel-release and rpm -qi epel-release
[root@katt-shanghai katt-server-install]# rpm -V epel-release [root@katt-shanghai katt-server-install]# rpm -qi epel-release Name : epel-release Version : 7 Release : 11 Architecture: noarch Install Date: Sun 28 Jun 2020 04:25:48 PM CST Group : System Environment/Base Size : 24834 License : GPLv2 Signature : RSA/SHA256, Fri 11 May 2018 08:21:29 PM CST, Key ID 24c6a8a7f4a80eb5 Source RPM : epel-release-7-11.src.rpm Build Date : Tue 03 Oct 2017 01:45:58 AM CST Build Host : buildvm-ppc64le-05.ppc.fedoraproject.org
This looks fine, although it seems it was re-signed with CentOS signing key. The current version is 7-12, by the way.
[...]
? Contents of /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo [root@katt-shanghai katt-server-install]# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo [epel] name=Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 - $basearch #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/$basearch metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=$basearch
That looks correct.
Regards, Dominik
On 1/07/20 10:07 pm, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
This looks fine, although it seems it was re-signed with CentOS signing key.
CentOS packages epel-release in the extras repo, so this is normal when it's installed that way.
Peter
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org