April 2022 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2044963] New: F36FailsToInstall: postorius
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Mar '23

08 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044963 Bug ID: 2044963 Summary: F36FailsToInstall: postorius Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-postorius Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, python-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 1992487 (F36FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok(a)redhat.com) Your package (python-postorius) Fails To Install in Fedora 36: can't install postorius: - nothing provides (python3.10dist(django) < 3.3~~ with python3.10dist(django) >= 2.2) needed by postorius-1.3.6-1.fc36.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992487 [Bug 1992487] Fedora 36 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044963

1 16

[Bug 2073097] New: CVE-2022-1270 GraphicsMagick: Heap buffer overflow when parsing MIFF
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Mar '23

01 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073097 Bug ID: 2073097 Summary: CVE-2022-1270 GraphicsMagick: Heap buffer overflow when parsing MIFF Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, rdieter(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other In GraphicsMagick, a heap buffer overflow was found when parsing MIFF. References: https://sourceforge.net/p/graphicsmagick/bugs/664/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073097

1 8

[Bug 2073098] New: CVE-2022-1270 GraphicsMagick: Heap buffer overflow when parsing MIFF [epel-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Mar '23

01 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073098 Bug ID: 2073098 Summary: CVE-2022-1270 GraphicsMagick: Heap buffer overflow when parsing MIFF [epel-all] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: GraphicsMagick Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: rdieter(a)gmail.com Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, rdieter(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of epel-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073098

1 3

[Bug 2073099] New: CVE-2022-1270 GraphicsMagick: Heap buffer overflow when parsing MIFF [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Mar '23

01 Mar '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073099 Bug ID: 2073099 Summary: CVE-2022-1270 GraphicsMagick: Heap buffer overflow when parsing MIFF [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 35 Status: NEW Component: GraphicsMagick Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: andreas(a)bawue.net Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas(a)bawue.net, dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, rdieter(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of fedora-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073099

1 5

[Bug 2077383] New: F37FailsToInstall: python3-tmuxp
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 Feb '23

21 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077383 Bug ID: 2077383 Summary: F37FailsToInstall: python3-tmuxp Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-tmuxp Assignee: igor.raits(a)gmail.com Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, igor.raits(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2045109 (F37FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok(a)redhat.com) Your package (python-tmuxp) Fails To Install in Fedora 37: can't install python3-tmuxp: - nothing provides (python3.10dist(click) < 8.1~~ with python3.10dist(click) >= 7) needed by python3-tmuxp-1.9.2-2.fc37.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-37-x86_64 --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=local install python3-tmuxp P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045109 [Bug 2045109] Fedora 37 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077383

1 9

[Bug 2063475] New: python-libtmux-0.11.0b2 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 Feb '23

21 Feb '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063475 Bug ID: 2063475 Summary: python-libtmux-0.11.0b2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-libtmux Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.11.0b2 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.10.3-1.fc37 URL: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/libtmux Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/13040/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063475

1 7

[Bug 2079295] New: Busybox requires ld-musl-x86_64.so.1, but must be static
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Jan '23

19 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295 Bug ID: 2079295 Summary: Busybox requires ld-musl-x86_64.so.1, but must be static Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: busybox Severity: medium Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com Reporter: atu(a)nmetau.edu.ua QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, dcavalca(a)fb.com, dvlasenk(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Busybox is a special binary, which must be static. However, it requires so from musl library. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): busybox-1:1.35.0-4.fc37.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -Uvh --test busybox-1.35.0-4.fc37.x86_64.rpm Actual results: error: Failed dependencies: ld-musl-x86_64.so.1()(64bit) is needed by busybox-1:1.35.0-4.fc37.x86_64 Expected results: Clean install without dependencies from any library. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295

1 11

[Bug 2069264] New: [abrt] notmuch: notmuch_tags_valid(): notmuch killed by SIGSEGV
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 Jan '23

03 Jan '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069264 Bug ID: 2069264 Summary: [abrt] notmuch: notmuch_tags_valid(): notmuch killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 35 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:984ab0912b2464ac1bdc7a4ed0314cd31128b91d;VAR IANT_ID=xfce; Component: notmuch Assignee: mjg(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jhutar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lewk(a)openmailbox.org, mjg(a)fedoraproject.org, rbean(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Some email have to be causing that :-/ neomutt is failing because of that as well when I have virtual-mailboxes configuerd. Command I have used in this case was: notmuch search "tag:zsdidaktis OR from:@zsdidaktis.cz" Version-Release number of selected component: notmuch-0.35-2.fc35 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.15.2 backtrace_rating: 4 cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-2.scope cmdline: notmuch search $'tag:zsdidaktis OR from:@zsdidaktis.cz' crash_function: notmuch_tags_valid executable: /usr/bin/notmuch journald_cursor: s=2b2e17a38b1e4b81b5a9d1b5dc73c207;i=4a10;b=b9117c89319c46bfb4da24d1af361aae;m=36b1505a0a;t=5db48d2887322;x=3e305f1fd4ce2258 kernel: 5.16.15-201.fc35.x86_64 rootdir: / runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (6 frames) #0 notmuch_tags_valid at lib/tags.c:51 #1 _thread_add_message at lib/thread.cc:254 #2 _notmuch_thread_create at lib/thread.cc:631 #3 notmuch_threads_get at lib/query.cc:671 #4 do_search_threads at /usr/src/debug/notmuch-0.35-2.fc35.x86_64/notmuch-search.c:150 #5 notmuch_search_command at /usr/src/debug/notmuch-0.35-2.fc35.x86_64/notmuch-search.c:845 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069264

1 10

[Bug 2070960] New: CVE-2022-0841 yarnpkg: npm-lockfile: os command injection [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Dec '22

14 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070960 Bug ID: 2070960 Summary: CVE-2022-0841 yarnpkg: npm-lockfile: os command injection [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 35 Status: NEW Component: yarnpkg Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: low Priority: low Assignee: zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Reporter: mcascell(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of fedora-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070960

1 4

[Bug 2059360] New: yarnpkg for fedora 35 installs binary '/usr/bin/%{fc_name}'
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 Dec '22

14 Dec '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059360 Bug ID: 2059360 Summary: yarnpkg for fedora 35 installs binary '/usr/bin/%{fc_name}' Product: Fedora Version: 35 Status: NEW Component: yarnpkg Assignee: zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Reporter: martin.kuehl(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: the current yarnpkg rpm installs a binary at the path '/usr/bin/%{fc_name}' this is also visible at: https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/yarnpkg/yarnpkg/fedora-35.html#files Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): yarnpkg-1.22.10-3.fc35 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf repoquery --list yarnpkg | grep /usr/bin or look at https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/yarnpkg/yarnpkg/fedora-35.html#files Actual results: /usr/bin/%{fc_name} /usr/bin/yarn /usr/bin/yarnpkg Expected results: judging by the package for fedora 36: /usr/bin/nodejs-yarn /usr/bin/yarn /usr/bin/yarnpkg Additional info: if i remember correctly that's rpm spec template syntax so there might be some stray escaping or something? it's also apparently fixed for f36 so backporting that package would be just fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2059360

1 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig April 2022