August 2022 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2042527] New: CVE-2022-22817 python-pillow: PIL.ImageMath.eval allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042527 Bug ID: 2042527 Summary: CVE-2022-22817 python-pillow: PIL.ImageMath.eval allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: gsuckevi(a)redhat.com CC: bdettelb(a)redhat.com, cstratak(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, miminar(a)redhat.com, orion(a)nwra.com, python-maint(a)redhat.com, python-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, torsava(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. Reference: https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#restrict-bu… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042527

1 23

[Bug 2042522] New: CVE-2022-22816 python-pillow: buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path in path_getbbox() in path.c
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042522 Bug ID: 2042522 Summary: CVE-2022-22816 python-pillow: buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path in path_getbbox() in path.c Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: gsuckevi(a)redhat.com CC: bdettelb(a)redhat.com, cstratak(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, miminar(a)redhat.com, orion(a)nwra.com, python-maint(a)redhat.com, python-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, torsava(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 has a buffer over-read during initialization of ImagePath.Path. References: https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/blob/c5d9223a8b5e9295d15b5a9b1ef1da… https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-image… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042522

1 22

[Bug 2042511] New: CVE-2022-22815 python-pillow: improperly initializes ImagePath.Path in path_getbbox() in path.c
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042511 Bug ID: 2042511 Summary: CVE-2022-22815 python-pillow: improperly initializes ImagePath.Path in path_getbbox() in path.c Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: gsuckevi(a)redhat.com CC: bdettelb(a)redhat.com, cstratak(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, miminar(a)redhat.com, orion(a)nwra.com, python-maint(a)redhat.com, python-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, torsava(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other path_getbbox in path.c in Pillow before 9.0.0 improperly initializes ImagePath.Path. References: https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/blob/c5d9223a8b5e9295d15b5a9b1ef1da… https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes/9.0.0.html#fixed-image… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042511

1 19

[Bug 2093731] New: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '24

25 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093731 Bug ID: 2093731 Summary: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode Product: Fedora Version: 36 Status: NEW Component: zbar Severity: high Assignee: gwync(a)protonmail.com Reporter: cristian.ciupitu(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dougsland(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gwync(a)protonmail.com, mchehab(a)infradead.org, mr.marcelo.barbosa(a)gmail.com, negativo17(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1886898 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1886898&action=edit Code 128 barcode Description of problem: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): zbar-0.23.90-1.fc36.x86_64 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. zbarimg barcode.png Actual results: scanned 0 barcode symbols from 1 images in 0 seconds WARNING: barcode data was not detected in some image(s) Things to check: - is the barcode type supported? Currently supported symbologies are: . EAN/UPC (EAN-13, EAN-8, EAN-2, EAN-5, UPC-A, UPC-E, ISBN-10, ISBN-13) . DataBar, DataBar Expanded . Code 128 . Code 93 . Code 39 . Codabar . Interleaved 2 of 5 . QR code . SQ code . PDF 417 - is the barcode large enough in the image? - is the barcode mostly in focus? - is there sufficient contrast/illumination? - If the symbol is split in several barcodes, are they combined in one image? - Did you enable the barcode type? some EAN/UPC codes are disabled by default. To enable all, use: $ zbarimg -S*.enable <files> Please also notice that some variants take precedence over others. Due to that, if you want, for example, ISBN-10, you should do: $ zbarimg -Sisbn10.enable <files> Expected results: (Code 128) 755897201062022179.73 Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093731

1 7

[Bug 2120537] New: 'bodhi updates new' does not report error/warning when setting karma limit below minimal value for package in critical path
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120537 Bug ID: 2120537 Summary: 'bodhi updates new' does not report error/warning when setting karma limit below minimal value for package in critical path Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: bodhi-client Assignee: thrcka(a)redhat.com Reporter: zdohnal(a)redhat.com CC: aurelien(a)bompard.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lenka(a)sepu.cz, thrcka(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi, I was surprised why my bodhi update ( https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6f5e420e52 ) doesn't show an option for pushing into stable or why the update is not in stable already, because the positive karma limit (1) is reached. On #fedora-devel IRC channel kalev answered: (09:34:34 AM) zdohnal: Hi all, do you have an idea what blocks this update https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6f5e420e52 from being pushed to the stable? (09:38:32 AM) kalev: zdohnal: looks like it's marked as critical path and because of that, it needs minimum of +2 karma to be pushed to stable (09:40:19 AM) GrannyGoose left the room (quit: Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)) (09:41:00 AM) zdohnal: kalev: aha - good to know. However bodhi-client should give me error when I set karma below this limit... According to the conversation, there is karma limit for components in critical path and it is higher - 2 - than the limit set by me - 1, which causes confusion. I use 'bodhi updates new' CLI command for creating updates, and I didn't see any error/warning regarding setting the karma limit too low. IMHO CLI command has to fail if user tries to set the limit too low, and bodhi web UI should handle this in some way as well. Would you mind looking into it? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): bodhi-client-6.0.1-4.fc37 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. $ bodhi updates new --type bugfix --close-bugs --request testing --autokarma --autotime --stable-karma 1 --unstable-karma -1 --notes "Update for component in critical path" <critical-component-1.2.3-1.fc37> Actual results: No error or warning, bodhi web ui shows user defined limit and the update has karma to fulfill the limit, but the update is not pushed into stable. Expected results: Give error (in both interfaces - CLI and Web UI) if user wants to set lower karma limit than it is required on the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120537

1 2

[Bug 2065645] New: Gmime 3.2.9 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 02 Dec '23

02 Dec '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065645 Bug ID: 2065645 Summary: Gmime 3.2.9 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All Status: NEW Component: gmime30 Severity: medium Assignee: klember(a)redhat.com Reporter: mjg(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Link ID: Github jstedfast/gmime/releases/tag/3.2.9 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Gmime 3.2.7 as packaged is outdated (Mar 2020). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.2.7-5 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf list gmime30 Actual results: gmime30-3.2.7 Expected results: gmime30-3.2.9 Additional info: The real upstream has been at https://github.com/jstedfast/gmime/ for quite some time now (not on gnome any more, and never on gitlab). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2065645

1 12

[Bug 2078238] New: gssdp-1.5.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078238 Bug ID: 2078238 Summary: gssdp-1.5.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gssdp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: klember(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com, zeenix(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.5.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.4.0.1-2.fc36 URL: https://developer.gnome.org/gssdp/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1262/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078238

1 27

[Bug 2081494] New: CVE-2022-1292 openssl: c_rehash script allows command injection
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Nov '23

08 Nov '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081494 Bug ID: 2081494 Summary: CVE-2022-1292 openssl: c_rehash script allows command injection Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: pdelbell(a)redhat.com CC: aos-bugs(a)redhat.com, asoldano(a)redhat.com, bbaranow(a)redhat.com, bdettelb(a)redhat.com, berrange(a)redhat.com, bmaxwell(a)redhat.com, bootloader-eng-team(a)redhat.com, brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com, caswilli(a)redhat.com, cdewolf(a)redhat.com, cfergeau(a)redhat.com, chazlett(a)redhat.com, crobinso(a)redhat.com, crypto-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, csutherl(a)redhat.com, darran.lofthouse(a)redhat.com, dbelyavs(a)redhat.com, ddepaula(a)redhat.com, dhalasz(a)redhat.com, dkreling(a)redhat.com, dkuc(a)redhat.com, dosoudil(a)redhat.com, dueno(a)redhat.com, elima(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, f4bug(a)amsat.org, fjansen(a)redhat.com, fjuma(a)redhat.com, fmartine(a)redhat.com, gparvin(a)redhat.com, gzaronik(a)redhat.com, iweiss(a)redhat.com, jburrell(a)redhat.com, jclere(a)redhat.com, jferlan(a)redhat.com, jkoehler(a)redhat.com, jochrist(a)redhat.com, jramanat(a)redhat.com, jwong(a)redhat.com, jwon(a)redhat.com, kaycoth(a)redhat.com, krathod(a)redhat.com, kraxel(a)redhat.com, ktietz(a)redhat.com, lgao(a)redhat.com, marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com, michal.skrivanek(a)redhat.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, micjohns(a)redhat.com, mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org, mosmerov(a)redhat.com, mperina(a)redhat.com, msochure(a)redhat.com, mspacek(a)redhat.com, msvehla(a)redhat.com, mturk(a)redhat.com, njean(a)redhat.com, nwallace(a)redhat.com, pahickey(a)redhat.com, pbonzini(a)redhat.com, pjindal(a)redhat.com, pjones(a)redhat.com, pmackay(a)redhat.com, redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, rfreiman(a)redhat.com, rharwood(a)redhat.com, rh-spice-bugs(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, rstancel(a)redhat.com, rsvoboda(a)redhat.com, sahana(a)redhat.com, sbonazzo(a)redhat.com, smaestri(a)redhat.com, stcannon(a)redhat.com, sthirugn(a)redhat.com, szappis(a)redhat.com, tmeszaro(a)redhat.com, tm(a)t8m.info, tom.jenkinson(a)redhat.com, virt-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, virt-maint(a)redhat.com, vkrizan(a)redhat.com, vkumar(a)redhat.com, vmugicag(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2ze OpenSSL 1.1.1 users should upgrade to 1.1.1o OpenSSL 3.0 users should upgrade to 3.0.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081494

1 53

[Bug 2090572] New: CVE-2022-21680 thrift: marked: regular expression block.def may lead Denial of Service [epel-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Jun '23

17 Jun '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090572 Bug ID: 2090572 Summary: CVE-2022-21680 thrift: marked: regular expression block.def may lead Denial of Service [epel-all] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: thrift Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: ctubbsii(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: saroy(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ctubbsii(a)fedoraproject.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, milleruntime(a)gmail.com, orion(a)nwra.com, willb(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of epel-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090572

1 3

[Bug 2092715] New: CVE-2022-21681 thrift: marked: regular expression inline.reflinkSearch may lead Denial of Service [epel-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Jun '23

17 Jun '23

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092715 Bug ID: 2092715 Summary: CVE-2022-21681 thrift: marked: regular expression inline.reflinkSearch may lead Denial of Service [epel-all] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: thrift Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: ctubbsii(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ctubbsii(a)fedoraproject.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, milleruntime(a)gmail.com, orion(a)nwra.com, willb(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of epel-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092715

1 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig August 2022