https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245370
Bug ID: 2245370
Summary: vokoscreenNG: segfault on startup
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: vokoscreenNG
Severity: medium
Assignee: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com
Reporter: loganjerry(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
A user reported in
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/vokoscreenng-3-8-0-vs-3-7-0/93244 that
vokoscreenNG segfaults on startup. I can replicate the problem on a Fedora 38
machine running a GNOME X11 session. Running under GDB:
Thread 1 "vokoscreenNG" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
QAction::setText (this=this@entry=0x0, text=...) at kernel/qaction.cpp:714
714 Q_D(QAction);
(gdb) bt
#0 QAction::setText(QString const&) (this=this@entry=0x0, text=...) at
kernel/qaction.cpp:714
#1 0x00005555555e7bb9 in QvkSystray::setMenueText() (this=0x5555573d0940) at
../systray/QvkSystray.cpp:186
#2 0x00005555555bffee in QvkMainWindow::changeLanguageInSourcecode()
(this=0x555555a59b80) at ../mainwindow.cpp:771
#3 0x0000555555631d4b in QvkMainWindow::slot_languageChanged(int)
(this=0x555555a59b80) at ../mainwindow.cpp:747
#4 QvkMainWindow::qt_static_metacall(QObject*, QMetaObject::Call, int, void**)
(_o=0x555555a59b80, _c=<optimized out>, _id=<optimized out>, _a=<optimized
out>)
at
/usr/src/debug/vokoscreenNG-3.8.0-1.fc38.x86_64/src/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/moc_mainwindow.cpp:273
#5 0x00007ffff64e8608 in doActivate<false>(QObject*, int, void**)
(sender=0x55555610f8c0, signal_index=12, argv=0x7fffffffd2e0) at
kernel/qobject.cpp:3937
#6 0x00007ffff64e33a7 in QMetaObject::activate(QObject*, QMetaObject const*,
int, void**)
(sender=sender@entry=0x55555610f8c0, m=m@entry=0x7ffff78d6be0
<QComboBox::staticMetaObject>, local_signal_index=local_signal_index@entry=5,
argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffd2e0) at kernel/qobject.cpp:3985
#7 0x00007ffff74bcd83 in QComboBox::currentIndexChanged(int)
(this=this@entry=0x55555610f8c0, _t1=<optimized out>)
at .moc/moc_qcombobox.cpp:538
#8 0x00007ffff74be72a in
QComboBoxPrivate::_q_emitCurrentIndexChanged(QModelIndex const&)
(this=this@entry=0x55555610eed0, index=...)
at
../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/itemmodels/qabstractitemmodel.h:62
#9 0x00007ffff74c22c4 in QComboBoxPrivate::setCurrentIndex(QModelIndex const&)
(this=this@entry=0x55555610eed0, mi=...) at widgets/qcombobox.cpp:2331
#10 0x00007ffff74c2669 in QComboBox::setCurrentIndex(int) (this=<optimized
out>, index=index@entry=15)
at widgets/qcombobox.cpp:2293
#11 0x0000555555657cbb in QvkSettings::readAll(Ui_formMainWindow*,
QMainWindow*) [clone .isra.0]
(ui_mainwindow=0x555555e23a80, parent=0x555555a59b80, this=<optimized out>)
at ../settings/QvkSettings.cpp:143
#12 0x000055555564598f in QvkMainWindow::QvkMainWindow(QWidget*) [clone
.constprop.0] (this=0x555555a59b80, parent=0x0)
at ../mainwindow.cpp:603
#13 0x000055555559d4ab in main(int, char**) (argc=<optimized out>,
argv=<optimized out>) at ../main.cpp:173
So "this" is NULL in frame 0. Moving up to frame 1, we are in this function
(in src/systray/QvkSystray.cpp):
void QvkSystray::setMenueText()
{
startAction->setText( tr( "Start" ) );
stopAction->setText( tr( "Stop" ) );
pauseAction->setText( tr( "Pause" ) );
continueAction->setText( tr( "Continue" ) );
cameraAction->setText( tr( "Camera" ) );
magnifierAction->setText( tr( "Magnification" ) );
exitAction->setText( tr( "Exit" ) );
}
The value of startAction is set in QvkSystray::init(). Setting a breakpoint on
that method verifies that it is not called prior to the segfault. That is,
QvkSystray::setMenueText() is called *before* QvkSystray::init().
The init() method should have been called in src/mainwindow.cpp, line 511.
Setting a breakpoint on line 510 shows that
QSystemTrayIcon::isSystemTrayAvailable() returns false, so the call to
QvkSystray::init() is skipped. In that case, the code should not call any more
QvkSystray methods, but goes on to call setMenueText anyway.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run vokoscreenNG in a GNOME X11 session on a Fedora 38 x86_64 machine
Actual Results:
A segfault.
Expected Results:
Normal execution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245370
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167264
Bug ID: 2167264
Summary: pngquant-3.0.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: pngquant
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: davide(a)cavalca.name
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besser82(a)fedoraproject.org, davide(a)cavalca.name,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
sergio(a)serjux.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 3.0.0, 3.0.1
Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.0.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.18.0-1.fc38
URL: https://pngquant.org/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3674/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pngquant
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2167264
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246605
Bug ID: 2246605
Summary: F40FailsToInstall: blender
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: blender
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: code(a)musicinmybrain.net,
design-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kwizart(a)gmail.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net,
negativo17(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2231790 (F40FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically by
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at
https://pagure.io/releng/
Your package (blender) Fails To Install in Fedora 40:
can't install blender:
- nothing provides libopenvdb.so.10.0()(64bit) needed by
blender-1:3.6.5-1.fc40.x86_64
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…)
your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.
P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer
than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the
koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock:
$ mock -r fedora-40-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install blender
P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple
dependent packages, please consider using side tags:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d…
Thanks!
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231790
[Bug 2231790] Fedora 40 Fails To install Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246605
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246609
Bug ID: 2246609
Summary: F40FailsToInstall: diskimage-builder
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: diskimage-builder
Assignee: amoralej(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: amoralej(a)redhat.com, apevec(a)redhat.com,
bnemec(a)redhat.com, davide(a)cavalca.name,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jslagle(a)redhat.com, mburns(a)redhat.com,
openstack-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2231790 (F40FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically by
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at
https://pagure.io/releng/
Your package (diskimage-builder) Fails To Install in Fedora 40:
can't install diskimage-builder:
- nothing provides (python3.12dist(flake8) < 6~~ with python3.12dist(flake8)
>= 3.6) needed by diskimage-builder-3.31.0-1.fc40.noarch
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…)
your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.
P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer
than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the
koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock:
$ mock -r fedora-40-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install
diskimage-builder
P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple
dependent packages, please consider using side tags:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d…
Thanks!
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231790
[Bug 2231790] Fedora 40 Fails To install Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246609
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246626
Bug ID: 2246626
Summary: libraw dependencies error in ImageMagick
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: ImageMagick
Severity: high
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: edgarfernavila(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: blaise(a)gmail.com, davide(a)cavalca.name,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
fedora(a)famillecollet.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net,
michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com,
pampelmuse(a)gmx.at, sergio(a)serjux.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1995835
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1995835&action=edit
I attach evidence of the 2 problems
Description of problem:
when you updated the repositories an error occurs when downloading ImageMagick
because there is a broken dependency called libraw
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246626
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246630
Bug ID: 2246630
Summary: CVE-2023-46234 yarnpkg: browserify-sign: upper bound
check issue in dsaVerify leads to a signature forgery
attack [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: yarnpkg
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: zsvetlik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pdelbell(a)redhat.com
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
manisandro(a)gmail.com, ngompa13(a)gmail.com,
zsvetlik(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246470
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246630
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243801
Bug ID: 2243801
Summary: ImageMagick rpm package needs rebuilding due to new
LibRaw in CentOS 9 Stream
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: ImageMagick
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: mail(a)lukaszposadowski.pl
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: blaise(a)gmail.com, davide(a)cavalca.name,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
fedora(a)famillecollet.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net,
michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com,
pampelmuse(a)gmx.at, sergio(a)serjux.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
ImageMagick rpm package needs rebuilding due to new LibRaw in CentOS 9 Stream.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ImageMagick-libs-6.9.12.93-1.el9.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to update CentOS 9 Stream with ImageMagick package installed.
2.
3.
Actual results:
dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 0:19:16 ago on Fri 13 Oct 2023 09:13:09 AM
CEST.
Error:
Problem: package ImageMagick-libs-6.9.12.93-1.el9.x86_64 from @System requires
libraw_r.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and
LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9.x86_64 from @System
- cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and
LibRaw-0.20.2-4.el9.x86_64 from appstream
- cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and
LibRaw-0.20.2-5.el9.x86_64 from appstream
- cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and
LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9.x86_64 from appstream
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
ImageMagick-libs-6.9.12.93-1.el9.x86_64
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or
'--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only
best candidate packages)
Expected results:
ImageMagick package updated.
Additional info:
After excluging LibRaw during dnf update it is updating well.
thank You
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243801
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…