April 2024 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2261615] New: python-xarray: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Jun '25

11 Jun '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261615 Bug ID: 2261615 Summary: python-xarray: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-xarray Assignee: quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jonathan(a)almalinux.org, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora python-xarray failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f40 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112403289 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild Please fix python-xarray at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, python-xarray will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 41, python-xarray will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261615 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 13

[Bug 2266404] New: luarocks-3.10.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Jun '25

05 Jun '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266404 Bug ID: 2266404 Summary: luarocks-3.10.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: luarocks Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com, lua-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 3.10.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.10.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.9.2-4.fc40 URL: https://luarocks.org/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1856/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/luarocks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266404 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 11

[Bug 2273611] New: golang-x-sync-0.7.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Jun '25

05 Jun '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273611 Bug ID: 2273611 Summary: golang-x-sync-0.7.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: golang-x-sync Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: asm(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: asm(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jchaloup(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.7.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.7.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.1.0-4.fc40 URL: https://golang.org/x/sync Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/369039/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-x-sync -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273611 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 26

[Bug 2093731] New: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Jun '25

04 Jun '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093731 Bug ID: 2093731 Summary: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode Product: Fedora Version: 36 Status: NEW Component: zbar Severity: high Assignee: gwync(a)protonmail.com Reporter: cristian.ciupitu(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dougsland(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gwync(a)protonmail.com, mchehab(a)infradead.org, mr.marcelo.barbosa(a)gmail.com, negativo17(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1886898 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1886898&action=edit Code 128 barcode Description of problem: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): zbar-0.23.90-1.fc36.x86_64 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. zbarimg barcode.png Actual results: scanned 0 barcode symbols from 1 images in 0 seconds WARNING: barcode data was not detected in some image(s) Things to check: - is the barcode type supported? Currently supported symbologies are: . EAN/UPC (EAN-13, EAN-8, EAN-2, EAN-5, UPC-A, UPC-E, ISBN-10, ISBN-13) . DataBar, DataBar Expanded . Code 128 . Code 93 . Code 39 . Codabar . Interleaved 2 of 5 . QR code . SQ code . PDF 417 - is the barcode large enough in the image? - is the barcode mostly in focus? - is there sufficient contrast/illumination? - If the symbol is split in several barcodes, are they combined in one image? - Did you enable the barcode type? some EAN/UPC codes are disabled by default. To enable all, use: $ zbarimg -S*.enable <files> Please also notice that some variants take precedence over others. Due to that, if you want, for example, ISBN-10, you should do: $ zbarimg -Sisbn10.enable <files> Expected results: (Code 128) 755897201062022179.73 Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093731

1 10

[Bug 2222350] New: CVE-2022-38900 yarnpkg: decode-uri-component: improper input validation resulting in DoS [epel-8]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 May '25

30 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222350 Bug ID: 2222350 Summary: CVE-2022-38900 yarnpkg: decode-uri-component: improper input validation resulting in DoS [epel-8] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: yarnpkg Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Reporter: mrehak(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170644 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222350 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2255116] New: [abrt] gnome-calendar: gtk_list_box_row_get_child(): gnome-calendar killed by SIGSEGV
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '25

28 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255116 Bug ID: 2255116 Summary: [abrt] gnome-calendar: gtk_list_box_row_get_child(): gnome-calendar killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 39 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:ca7a59a53752557e80062383671d27cc665e7a45;VAR IANT_ID=workstation; Component: gnome-calendar Assignee: gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: eazel7(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, igor.raits(a)gmail.com, klember(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: gnome-calendar-45.1-1.fc39 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.17.11 type: CCpp reason: gnome-calendar killed by SIGSEGV journald_cursor: s=3452a52fb1ca43a28acf90fd9dda0129;i=33aaf;b=cb83aca6892849e3b74afa430acf9ff8;m=15f98ec181;t=60ccc6150421e;x=607631cee761312 executable: /usr/bin/gnome-calendar cmdline: /usr/bin/gnome-calendar --gapplication-service cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/app.slice/dbus-:1.2-org.gnome.Calendar@1.service rootdir: / uid: 1000 kernel: 6.6.6-200.fc39.x86_64 package: gnome-calendar-45.1-1.fc39 runlevel: N 5 dso_list: /usr/bin/gnome-calendar gnome-calendar-45.1-1.fc39.x86_64 (Fedora Project) 1702679189 backtrace_rating: 4 crash_function: gtk_list_box_row_get_child Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (8 frames) #0 gtk_list_box_row_get_child at ../gtk/gtklistbox.c:3009 #1 gcal_agenda_view_remove_event at ../src/gui/views/gcal-agenda-view.c:585 #2 remove_event_from_subscriber at ../src/core/gcal-timeline.c:255 #3 timeline_source_dispatch at ../src/core/gcal-timeline.c:774 #5 g_main_context_dispatch_unlocked at ../glib/gmain.c:4284 #6 g_main_context_iterate_unlocked.isra.0 at ../glib/gmain.c:4349 #7 g_main_context_iteration at ../glib/gmain.c:4414 #8 g_application_run at ../gio/gapplication.c:2577 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255116 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2239437] New: gnome-calendar-45.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '25

28 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239437 Bug ID: 2239437 Summary: gnome-calendar-45.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gnome-calendar Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, igor.raits(a)gmail.com, klember(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 45.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 45.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 45~rc-1.fc40 URL: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Calendar Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/10906/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-calendar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239437 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 16

[Bug 2256783] New: FTBFS with autoconf 2.72
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '25

21 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256783 Bug ID: 2256783 Summary: FTBFS with autoconf 2.72 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: gmime Severity: medium Assignee: alexl(a)redhat.com Reporter: fberat(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, walter.pete(a)yandex.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The component fails to build with autoconf 2.72 due to its use of Autoconf internal variables in its configure.ac file. the following section needs to be adapted (or better removed): dnl ************************************* dnl *** Checks for large file support *** dnl ************************************* AC_ARG_ENABLE([largefile], AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-largefile], [enable support for large files [[default=yes]]]),, [enable_largefile="yes"]) [...] if test "x$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits" != "xno"; then LFS_CFLAGS="$LFS_CFLAGS -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits" enable_largefile="yes" fi else LFS_CFLAGS="" fi AM_CONDITIONAL(ENABLE_LARGEFILE, test "x$enable_largefile" = "xyes") The main problem of this section being the check against `$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits` which no longer exists. Leading to further failures. AC_SYS_LARGEFILE will define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS if necessary. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256783 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 8

[Bug 2264279] New: python-zarr-2.17.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 May '25

19 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264279 Bug ID: 2264279 Summary: python-zarr-2.17.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-zarr Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jonathan(a)almalinux.org, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.17.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.17.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.16.1-1.fc40 URL: https://github.com/zarr-developers/zarr Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19522/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-zarr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264279 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 36

[Bug 2276800] New: CVE-2024-32875 hugo: title arguments in Markdown for links and images not escaped in internal render hooks [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 May '25

16 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276800 Bug ID: 2276800 Summary: CVE-2024-32875 hugo: title arguments in Markdown for links and images not escaped in internal render hooks [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 40 Status: NEW Component: hugo Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com Reporter: rkeshri(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, neil(a)shrug.pw, quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com, redhat(a)flyn.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276799 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276800 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig April 2024