https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223039
Bug ID: 2223039
Summary: Something is preventing unicorn from building on s390x
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: unicorn
Severity: medium
Assignee: redhat(a)flyn.org
Reporter: mike(a)flyn.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch, redhat(a)flyn.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Building unicorn on Fedora's s390x build hosts fails with the error message
below. I suspect this is due to a compiler change or perhaps a change to a
dependency.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Run "fedpkg build" from the package's Git repository.
Actual Results:
See https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8545/103368545/build.log.
Here is a summary:
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_ldo_le_mmu_ppc64'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_ldo_be_mmu_ppc64'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_cmpxchgo_le_mmu_aarch64'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_cmpxchgo_be_mmu_aarch64'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_sto_be_mmu_s390x'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_ldo_be_mmu_s390x'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_cmpxchgo_be_mmu_s390x'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_cmpxchgo_be_mmu_ppc64'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_sto_be_mmu_ppc64'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_cmpxchgo_le_mmu_ppc64'
/usr/bin/ld: libunicorn.so.2: undefined reference to
`helper_atomic_sto_le_mmu_ppc64'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/sample_batch_reg.dir/build.make:98: sample_batch_reg]
Error 1
gmake[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:779: CMakeFiles/sample_batch_reg.dir/all]
Error 2
A similar report upstream:
https://github.com/unicorn-engine/unicorn/issues/1840
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223039
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093731
Bug ID: 2093731
Summary: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Status: NEW
Component: zbar
Severity: high
Assignee: gwync(a)protonmail.com
Reporter: cristian.ciupitu(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dougsland(a)redhat.com,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gwync(a)protonmail.com, mchehab(a)infradead.org,
mr.marcelo.barbosa(a)gmail.com, negativo17(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1886898
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1886898&action=edit
Code 128 barcode
Description of problem:
zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
zbar-0.23.90-1.fc36.x86_64
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. zbarimg barcode.png
Actual results:
scanned 0 barcode symbols from 1 images in 0 seconds
WARNING: barcode data was not detected in some image(s)
Things to check:
- is the barcode type supported? Currently supported symbologies are:
. EAN/UPC (EAN-13, EAN-8, EAN-2, EAN-5, UPC-A, UPC-E, ISBN-10, ISBN-13)
. DataBar, DataBar Expanded
. Code 128
. Code 93
. Code 39
. Codabar
. Interleaved 2 of 5
. QR code
. SQ code
. PDF 417
- is the barcode large enough in the image?
- is the barcode mostly in focus?
- is there sufficient contrast/illumination?
- If the symbol is split in several barcodes, are they combined in one image?
- Did you enable the barcode type?
some EAN/UPC codes are disabled by default. To enable all, use:
$ zbarimg -S*.enable <files>
Please also notice that some variants take precedence over others.
Due to that, if you want, for example, ISBN-10, you should do:
$ zbarimg -Sisbn10.enable <files>
Expected results:
(Code 128) 755897201062022179.73
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093731
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222350
Bug ID: 2222350
Summary: CVE-2022-38900 yarnpkg: decode-uri-component: improper
input validation resulting in DoS [epel-8]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: yarnpkg
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: zsvetlik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mrehak(a)redhat.com
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
manisandro(a)gmail.com, ngompa13(a)gmail.com,
zsvetlik(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170644
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222350
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256783
Bug ID: 2256783
Summary: FTBFS with autoconf 2.72
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: gmime
Severity: medium
Assignee: alexl(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fberat(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: alexl(a)redhat.com,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, walter.pete(a)yandex.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The component fails to build with autoconf 2.72 due to its use of Autoconf
internal variables in its configure.ac file.
the following section needs to be adapted (or better removed):
dnl *************************************
dnl *** Checks for large file support ***
dnl *************************************
AC_ARG_ENABLE([largefile],
AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-largefile],
[enable support for large files [[default=yes]]]),,
[enable_largefile="yes"])
[...]
if test "x$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits" != "xno"; then
LFS_CFLAGS="$LFS_CFLAGS
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits"
enable_largefile="yes"
fi
else
LFS_CFLAGS=""
fi
AM_CONDITIONAL(ENABLE_LARGEFILE, test "x$enable_largefile" = "xyes")
The main problem of this section being the check against
`$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits` which no longer exists. Leading to further
failures.
AC_SYS_LARGEFILE will define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS if necessary.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256783
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276800
Bug ID: 2276800
Summary: CVE-2024-32875 hugo: title arguments in Markdown for
links and images not escaped in internal render hooks
[fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Status: NEW
Component: hugo
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com
Reporter: rkeshri(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, neil(a)shrug.pw,
quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com, redhat(a)flyn.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276799
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276800
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272681
Bug ID: 2272681
Summary: [abrt] gnome-calendar:
g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a():
gnome-calendar killed by SIGSEGV
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:2c721158b5e537cf6c943db83af7d4843fe1e1f1;VAR
IANT_ID=workstation;
Component: gnome-calendar
Assignee: gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: dan.p.craw(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
igor.raits(a)gmail.com, klember(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I exit the application like I normally would using the X in the top right
Version-Release number of selected component:
gnome-calendar-46.0-1.fc40
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.17.15
type: CCpp
reason: gnome-calendar killed by SIGSEGV
journald_cursor:
s=907e1d0e7af84b4996007471e0e52560;i=e85e;b=c07dbd45ceb0489bb28fd7eed8474486;m=5e8237bb;t=6151e421587b6;x=ad10ac7c5eda6653
executable: /usr/bin/gnome-calendar
cmdline: /usr/bin/gnome-calendar --gapplication-service
cgroup:
0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/app.slice/dbus-:1.2-org.gnome.Calendar@0.service
rootdir: /
uid: 1000
kernel: 6.8.2-300.fc40.x86_64
package: gnome-calendar-46.0-1.fc40
runlevel: N 5
backtrace_rating: 4
crash_function: g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a
comment: I exit the application like I normally would using the X in the
top right
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (14 frames)
#0 g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a at ../gobject/gtype.c:4154
#2 on_gclue_client_stopped_cb at ../src/weather/gcal-weather-service.c:810
#3 g_task_return_now at ../gio/gtask.c:1361
#4 g_task_return at ../gio/gtask.c:1430
#6 reply_cb at ../gio/gdbusproxy.c:2555
#7 g_task_return_now at ../gio/gtask.c:1361
#8 g_task_return at ../gio/gtask.c:1430
#10 g_dbus_connection_call_done at ../gio/gdbusconnection.c:5897
#11 g_task_return_now at ../gio/gtask.c:1361
#12 complete_in_idle_cb at ../gio/gtask.c:1375
#15 g_main_context_dispatch_unlocked at ../glib/gmain.c:4152
#16 g_main_context_iterate_unlocked.isra.0 at ../glib/gmain.c:4217
#17 g_main_context_iteration at ../glib/gmain.c:4282
#18 g_application_run at ../gio/gapplication.c:2712
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272681
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269647
Bug ID: 2269647
Summary: [abrt] cinnamon:
g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a(): cinnamon
killed by SIGSEGV
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:3910e2e3252c8b648322ce8386cf0e2b57ab4b9c;VAR
IANT_ID=cinnamon;
Component: cinnamon
Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com
Reporter: fabiojlbc1982(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, miketwebster(a)gmail.com,
riehecky(a)fnal.gov
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Version-Release number of selected component:
cinnamon-6.0.4-5.fc40
Additional info:
reporter: libreport-2.17.15
type: CCpp
reason: cinnamon killed by SIGSEGV
journald_cursor:
s=52d7c2eb2897498a9440d49a25feb194;i=31d9;b=2628598754e74631ba5b1ffb889ce96a;m=8cbd502;t=613ab67e8273b;x=b542357ba3e57f7a
executable: /usr/bin/cinnamon
cmdline: /usr/bin/cinnamon --replace
cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-2.scope
rootdir: /
uid: 1000
kernel: 6.8.0-63.fc40.1.x86_64
package: cinnamon-6.0.4-5.fc40
runlevel: N 5
backtrace_rating: 4
crash_function: g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (18 frames)
#0 g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a at ../gobject/gtype.c:4153
#2 _cinnamon_app_remove_window at ../src/cinnamon-app.c:995
#5 signal_emit_unlocked_R.isra.0 at ../gobject/gsignal.c:3879
#6 signal_emit_valist_unlocked at ../gobject/gsignal.c:3511
#9 meta_window_unmanage at ../src/core/window.c:1679
#10 meta_wayland_shell_surface_destroy_window at
../src/wayland/meta-wayland-shell-surface.c:368
#11 xdg_toplevel_destructor.lto_priv at
../src/wayland/meta-wayland-xdg-shell.c:194
#12 destroy_resource at ../src/wayland-server.c:732
#13 wl_resource_destroy at ../src/wayland-server.c:749
#14 ffi_call_unix64 at ../src/x86/unix64.S:104
#15 ffi_call_int at ../src/x86/ffi64.c:673
#16 ffi_call at ../src/x86/ffi64.c:710
#17 wl_closure_invoke at ../src/connection.c:1025
#18 wl_client_connection_data at ../src/wayland-server.c:438
#19 wl_event_loop_dispatch at ../src/event-loop.c:1027
#20 wayland_event_source_dispatch at ../src/wayland/meta-wayland.c:94
#22 g_main_context_dispatch_unlocked at ../glib/gmain.c:4152
#23 g_main_context_iterate_unlocked.isra.0 at ../glib/gmain.c:4217
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269647
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…