May 2024 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2280175] New: [abrt] cinnamon: std::__atomic_base<unsigned long>::load(): cinnamon killed by SIGSEGV
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 May '24

15 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280175 Bug ID: 2280175 Summary: [abrt] cinnamon: std::__atomic_base<unsigned long>::load(): cinnamon killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:1f9c07ff4becff90a3617fc3ccc8c2aa8cb814d4;VAR IANT_ID=workstation; Component: cinnamon Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com Reporter: aauzi(a)free.fr QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, miketwebster(a)gmail.com, riehecky(a)fnal.gov Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: It happended on an attempt to wake the PC from deep sleep or, maybe, hibernation. I first used the mouse, the screen backlight went on... then nothing more. After few seconds, despite my efforts to mouse the mouse, use the keyboard, the screen backlight went off. At this stage, I had to force the power off. Version-Release number of selected component: cinnamon-6.0.4-6.fc40 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.17.15 crash_function: std::__atomic_base<unsigned long>::load type: CCpp dso_list: /usr/bin/cinnamon cinnamon-6.0.4-6.fc40.x86_64 (Fedora Project) 1714659458 rootdir: / uid: 1000 kernel: 6.8.9-300.fc40.x86_64 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: cinnamon --replace reason: cinnamon killed by SIGSEGV package: cinnamon-6.0.4-6.fc40 journald_cursor: s=4b82b3d0656a4445b058dd19f0d529a3;i=58bb30;b=2379fa2430584f3aa087a1b7fae4e280;m=1e8cf274ac;t=61849a7845b2b;x=dc2ef7597513be0c executable: /usr/bin/cinnamon cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-2.scope runlevel: N 5 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (2 frames) #0 std::__atomic_base<unsigned long>::load at /usr/include/c++/14/bits/atomic_base.h:499 #1 mozilla::detail::IntrinsicMemoryOps<unsigned long, (mozilla::MemoryOrdering)0>::load at /usr/src/debug/mozjs102-102.15.1-5.fc40.x86_64/dist/include/mozilla/Atomics.h:195 Potential duplicate: bug 2222870 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280175 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2280614] New: CVE-2024-4068 yarnpkg: braces: fails to limit the number of characters it can handle [epel-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 May '24

15 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280614 Bug ID: 2280614 Summary: CVE-2024-4068 yarnpkg: braces: fails to limit the number of characters it can handle [epel-all] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: yarnpkg Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Reporter: rkeshri(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280600 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280614 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2278107] New: The avr32 target is not 32-bit avr. It's 8-bit avr
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 May '24

15 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278107 Bug ID: 2278107 Summary: The avr32 target is not 32-bit avr. It's 8-bit avr Product: Fedora Version: 40 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: cross-gcc Severity: low Assignee: dhowells(a)redhat.com Reporter: asgj(a)gomspace.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dan(a)danny.cz, dhowells(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lkundrak(a)v3.sk Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I am currently stuck with some legacy hardware based on the AT32UC0512C 32-bit avr MCU and stumbled opun this package by accident and got very excited as the official atmel/Microchip gcc compiler distribution is based on a very old gcc version (4.4.7). Opun further investigation, it seems that this was just a wild goose chase / red herring as the package simply wraps --target=avr-linux, which is just 8-bit avr. I'm not sure what to to about this. Perhaps rename the package to avoid further confusion, or if there's a rationale behind the naming, maybe update the package description from "Cross-build binary utilities for avr32-linux-gnu" to "Cross-build binary utilities for avr32-linux-gnu (8-bit avr)" or something similar. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278107 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2279991] New: python-cloudpickle fails to build with Python 3.13: tests/cloudpickle_test.py::test_extract_class_dict: AssertionError
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 May '24

15 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279991 Bug ID: 2279991 Summary: python-cloudpickle fails to build with Python 3.13: tests/cloudpickle_test.py::test_extract_class_dict: AssertionError Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-cloudpickle Assignee: lbalhar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jonathan(a)almalinux.org, ksurma(a)redhat.com, lbalhar(a)redhat.com, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2244836 (PYTHON3.13) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora python-cloudpickle fails to build with Python 3.13.0b1. =================================== FAILURES =================================== ___________________________ test_extract_class_dict ____________________________ def test_extract_class_dict(): class A(int): """A docstring""" def method(self): return "a" class B: """B docstring""" B_CONSTANT = 42 def method(self): return "b" class C(A, B): C_CONSTANT = 43 def method_c(self): return "c" clsdict = _extract_class_dict(C) > assert sorted(clsdict.keys()) == ["C_CONSTANT", "__doc__", "method_c"] E AssertionError: assert ['C_CONSTANT'...', 'method_c'] == ['C_CONSTANT'...', 'method_c'] E At index 2 diff: '__firstlineno__' != 'method_c' E Left contains one more item: 'method_c' E Full diff: E - ['C_CONSTANT', '__doc__', 'method_c'] E + ['C_CONSTANT', '__doc__', '__firstlineno__', 'method_c'] E ? +++++++++++++++++++ tests/cloudpickle_test.py:111: AssertionError =========================== short test summary info ============================ FAILED tests/cloudpickle_test.py::test_extract_class_dict - AssertionError: a... ============ 1 failed, 232 passed, 25 skipped, 2 warnings in 11.75s ============ https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-r… For all our attempts to build python-cloudpickle with Python 3.13, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/python-… Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836 [Bug 2244836] Python 3.13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279991 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2279990] New: python-pure-eval fails to build with Python 3.13: test_sys_modules: AssertionError
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 May '24

15 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279990 Bug ID: 2279990 Summary: python-pure-eval fails to build with Python 3.13: test_sys_modules: AssertionError Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-pure-eval Assignee: lbalhar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ksurma(a)redhat.com, lbalhar(a)redhat.com, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2244836 (PYTHON3.13) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora python-pure-eval fails to build with Python 3.13.0b1. =================================== FAILURES =================================== _______________________________ test_sys_modules _______________________________ def test_sys_modules(): modules = sys_modules_sources() if not os.environ.get('PURE_EVAL_SLOW_TESTS'): modules = islice(modules, 0, 3) for filename, source, tree in modules: print(filename) if not filename.endswith("ast.py"): > check_copy_ast_without_context(tree) tests/test_utils.py:53: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ tree = <ast.Module object at 0x7f87699d70d0> def check_copy_ast_without_context(tree): tree2 = copy_ast_without_context(tree) dump1 = ast.dump(tree) dump2 = ast.dump(tree2) normalised_dump1 = re.sub( r", ctx=(Load|Store|Del)", "", dump1 ) > assert normalised_dump1 == dump2 E assert "Module(body=...e__'))]))])])" == "Module(body=...e__'))]))])])" E Skipping 4274 identical leading characters in diff, use -v to show E - alue=List()), Assign(targets=[Attribute(value=Name(id='self'), attr='_iterating')], value=Call(func=Name(id='set'))), Assign(targets=[Attribute(value=Name(id='self'), attr='data')], value=Dict())]), FunctionDef(name='_commit_removals', args=arguments(args=[arg(arg='self')]), body=[Assign(targets=[Name(id='pop')], value=Attribute(value=Attribute(value=Name(id='self'), attr='_pending_removals'), attr='pop')), Assign(targets=[Name(id='d')], value=Attribute(value=Name(id='self'), attr='data')), While(test=C... E E ...Full output truncated (4 lines hidden), use '-vv' to show tests/test_utils.py:65: AssertionError FAILED tests/test_utils.py::test_sys_modules - assert "Module(body=...e__'))]... https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-r… For all our attempts to build python-pure-eval with Python 3.13, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/python-… Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836 [Bug 2244836] Python 3.13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279990 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 2

[Bug 2280338] New: License files should be stored separately from the documentation
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 14 May '24

14 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280338 Bug ID: 2280338 Summary: License files should be stored separately from the documentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: sdbus-cpp Severity: medium Assignee: mblaha(a)redhat.com Reporter: rvykydal(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mblaha(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The license file is stored in /usr/share/doc/sdbus-c++ while it should be probably stored in /usr/share/licenses folder. The issue was revealed by anaconda installer kickstart test testing --excludedocs package selection option: https://github.com/rvykydal/kickstart-tests/blob/master/packages-excludedoc… We could workaround the issue in our tests but we are also filing this bug to see if it can be fixed on the sdbus-cpp packaging side. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. check where is the license stored [rvykydal@prnot4 ~]$ rpm -qL sdbus-cpp /usr/share/doc/sdbus-c++/COPYING 2. 3. Actual Results: The license is stored in /usr/share/doc/sdbus-c++ Expected Results: The license is stored in /usr/share/licenses subfolder. We hit a similar issue a while ago for xz package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590873 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280338 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2250265] s390 cross-compiler isn't suiteable for building openssl
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 May '24

13 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson(a)gmail.com Last Closed| |2024-05-13 16:06:47 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> --- The cross-gcc is designed for static linked binaries such as firmware or standalone binaries, it's complex to deal with shared libraries builds because you need to have chroot envs etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250265 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2280142] New: [abrt] nemo: g_key_file_set_group_comment(): nemo killed by SIGABRT
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '24

12 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280142 Bug ID: 2280142 Summary: [abrt] nemo: g_key_file_set_group_comment(): nemo killed by SIGABRT Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:e22745ddf8cb555fb810fd306774a4f371753dbd;VAR IANT_ID=workstation; Component: nemo Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com Reporter: fedora(a)pires.pro QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, riehecky(a)fnal.gov Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Version-Release number of selected component: nemo-6.0.2-4.fc40 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.17.15 type: CCpp reason: nemo killed by SIGABRT journald_cursor: s=4bd04ce12d28412d86f8008d4f3bf16a;i=e2be2;b=8d2d03db5e914cd293faf4f0c58ada98;m=27311f273;t=6184151836264;x=9a15a81bcdd6acff executable: /usr/bin/nemo cmdline: /usr/bin/nemo --no-default-window cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/user@1000.service/app.slice/dbus-:1.2-org.freedesktop.FileManager1@4.service rootdir: / uid: 1000 kernel: 6.8.9-300.fc40.x86_64 package: nemo-6.0.2-4.fc40 runlevel: N 5 backtrace_rating: 4 crash_function: g_key_file_set_group_comment Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (8 frames) #4 g_key_file_set_group_comment at ../glib/gkeyfile.c:3401 #5 memcpy at /usr/include/bits/string_fortified.h:29 #6 g_strdup_inline at ../glib/gstrfuncs.h:318 #8 nemo_window_get_active_slot at ../src/nemo-window.c:1759 #10 update_places at ../src/nemo-places-sidebar.c:789 #12 signal_emit_unlocked_R.isra.0 at ../gobject/gsignal.c:3888 #13 signal_emit_valist_unlocked at ../gobject/gsignal.c:3520 #16 g_settings_real_change_event at ../gio/gsettings.c:385 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280142 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2250709] New: Notice: python-flit-core will be automatically retired from EPEL 9 when RHEL 9.4 is released
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 May '24

10 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250709 Bug ID: 2250709 Summary: Notice: python-flit-core will be automatically retired from EPEL 9 when RHEL 9.4 is released Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: python-flit-core Assignee: maxwell(a)gtmx.me Reporter: rhel-process-autobot(a)bot.bugzilla.redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, maxwell(a)gtmx.me, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250709 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2279999] New: Cinnamon Preferences (Settings) is missing Online Accounts module
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 May '24

10 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279999 Bug ID: 2279999 Summary: Cinnamon Preferences (Settings) is missing Online Accounts module Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: cinnamon-control-center Keywords: Desktop, Regression, Upgrades Severity: high Assignee: leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com Reporter: neil(a)darlow.co.uk QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com, riehecky(a)fnal.gov Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora After updating from fedora Workstation 39 Cinnamon to Workstation 40 Cinnamon the Preferences (Settings) feature no longer has Online Accounts present. Google Account credentials are often upgraded to a new generation and require re-entry but without this feature the account is rendered inoperative. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Upgrade fedora Workstation 39 Cinnamon to Workstation 40 Cinnamon. 2. 3. Actual Results: The Online Accounts feature is missing from the Preferences Menu and Settings application. Expected Results: Online Accounts availability should be preserved over the upgrade. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279999 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig May 2024