August 2024 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2300701] New: gmime: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f41
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 May '25

13 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2300701 Bug ID: 2300701 Summary: gmime: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f41 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gmime Assignee: alexl(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, walter.pete(a)yandex.com Blocks: 2260875 (F41FTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora gmime failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f41 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=120660987 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_41_Mass_Rebuild Please fix gmime at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, gmime will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 42, gmime will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260875 [Bug 2260875] Fedora 41 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2300701 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2256783] New: FTBFS with autoconf 2.72
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 May '25

13 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256783 Bug ID: 2256783 Summary: FTBFS with autoconf 2.72 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: gmime Severity: medium Assignee: alexl(a)redhat.com Reporter: fberat(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: alexl(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, walter.pete(a)yandex.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The component fails to build with autoconf 2.72 due to its use of Autoconf internal variables in its configure.ac file. the following section needs to be adapted (or better removed): dnl ************************************* dnl *** Checks for large file support *** dnl ************************************* AC_ARG_ENABLE([largefile], AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-largefile], [enable support for large files [[default=yes]]]),, [enable_largefile="yes"]) [...] if test "x$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits" != "xno"; then LFS_CFLAGS="$LFS_CFLAGS -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits" enable_largefile="yes" fi else LFS_CFLAGS="" fi AM_CONDITIONAL(ENABLE_LARGEFILE, test "x$enable_largefile" = "xyes") The main problem of this section being the check against `$ac_cv_sys_file_offset_bits` which no longer exists. Leading to further failures. AC_SYS_LARGEFILE will define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS if necessary. Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256783 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2262655] New: python-Bottleneck-1.3.8rc3 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 May '25

13 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262655 Bug ID: 2262655 Summary: python-Bottleneck-1.3.8rc3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-Bottleneck Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: besser82(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besser82(a)fedoraproject.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jonathan(a)almalinux.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.3.8rc3 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.3.8rc3 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.3.7-5.fc40 URL: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Bottleneck Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3787/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-Bottleneck -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262655 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 38

[Bug 2209027] New: psutils-3.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '25

12 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209027 Bug ID: 2209027 Summary: psutils-3.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: psutils Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: opohorel(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, opohorel(a)redhat.com, ppisar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 3.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.10-1.fc39 URL: https://github.com/rrthomas/psutils Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/12921/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/psutils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209027

1 20

[Bug 2294591] New: Crashes and issues after some other package was updated, probably a dependency or a driver
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '25

12 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294591 Bug ID: 2294591 Summary: Crashes and issues after some other package was updated, probably a dependency or a driver Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/issues/12 3841 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: blender Keywords: Regression Severity: urgent Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: fygdxcyw(a)sharklasers.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: code(a)musicinmybrain.net, design-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kwizart(a)gmail.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net, negativo17(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora These issues, that have been reported at the Blender bug tracker, seem to be an issue with a fedora package: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/issues/123841 https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/issues/123843 https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/issues/123844 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Steps are in the original bug report at the Blender bug tracker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294591 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 56

[Bug 2290513] New: dahdi-tools-2.11.1-31.fc41 FTBFS: %setup0 does not expand with rpm-build-4.19.91
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 May '25

10 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290513 Bug ID: 2290513 Summary: dahdi-tools-2.11.1-31.fc41 FTBFS: %setup0 does not expand with rpm-build-4.19.91 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl_rebuild/scratch/l atest/packages/dahdi-tools/build.log Status: NEW Component: dahdi-tools Assignee: jsmith.fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jsmith.fedora(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2260875 (F41FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora dahdi-tools-2.11.1-31.fc41 fails to build from sources in Fedora 41: Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ee9Znl + umask 022 + cd /home/test/fedora/dahdi-tools/dahdi-tools-2.11.1-build + %setup0 -q -n dahdi-tools-2.11.1 -a 2 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ee9Znl: line 34: fg: no job control error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ee9Znl (%prep) It seems that %setup0 macro does not expand with rpm-build-4.19.91-7.fc41.x86_64. I believe that rpm intentionally stopped supporting "macros" with a variadic digit suffix (%path0, %setup0 etc.). Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260875 [Bug 2260875] Fedora 41 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290513 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 13

[Bug 2298299] New: Not working with Moto G52 "rhode" when not running with sudo
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 May '25

09 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2298299 Bug ID: 2298299 Summary: Not working with Moto G52 "rhode" when not running with sudo Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://pad.riseup.net/p/7VFGuPyAUbhXot8im7ah OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: android-tools Keywords: Bugfix Severity: medium Assignee: ivan.afonichev(a)gmail.com Reporter: fedoraaccounts(a)lucasmz.dev QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ivan.afonichev(a)gmail.com, jeroen(a)tietema.net Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I have a Moto G52, codename rhode. ADB, and fastboot do not work properly. When running `fastboot devices` I get a "no permissions" error, which is solved by using `sudo`. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: With the device plugged in, 1. Get device to fastboot/bootloader mode 2. Run `fastboot devices` For ADB, 1. Enable USB Debugging in Android's Developer Options 2. Run `adb devices` Actual Results: Errors, seem to be related to permissions. Expected Results: Run fine, without sudo. Using adb sideload from recovery mode actually seems to work fine, at least with CalyxOS. Extra info in link. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2298299 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2272349] New: python-flufl-lock-8.1.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 May '25

08 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272349 Bug ID: 2272349 Summary: python-flufl-lock-8.1.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-flufl-lock Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: aurelien(a)bompard.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aurelien(a)bompard.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jonathan(a)almalinux.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 8.1.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 8.1.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 8.0.2-1.fc40 URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flufl-lock -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272349 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2299906] New: python-atpublic-5.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299906 Bug ID: 2299906 Summary: python-atpublic-5.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-atpublic Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: aurelien(a)bompard.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: aurelien(a)bompard.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jonathan(a)almalinux.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 5.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.1.0-3.fc41 URL: http://public.readthedocs.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19703/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-atpublic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299906 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 11

[Bug 2293212] New: CVE-2024-28863 yarnpkg: node-tar: denial of service while parsing a tar file due to lack of folders depth validation [epel-8]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293212 Bug ID: 2293212 Summary: CVE-2024-28863 yarnpkg: node-tar: denial of service while parsing a tar file due to lack of folders depth validation [epel-8] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: yarnpkg Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, zsvetlik(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293200 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293212 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig August 2024