https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272349
Bug ID: 2272349
Summary: python-flufl-lock-8.1.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: python-flufl-lock
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: aurelien(a)bompard.org
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aurelien(a)bompard.org,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jonathan(a)almalinux.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name,
python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 8.1.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 8.1.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 8.0.2-1.fc40
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flufl-lock
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272349
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210464
Bug ID: 2210464
Summary: python-nbxmpp-4.3.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: python-nbxmpp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: mschmidt(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mschmidt(a)redhat.com, suraia(a)ikkoku.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 4.3.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.3.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 4.2.2-1.fc39
URL: https://dev.gajim.org/gajim/python-nbxmpp/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/12980/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nbxmpp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210464
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210415
Bug ID: 2210415
Summary: gajim-1.8.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: gajim
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: mschmidt(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
lemenkov(a)gmail.com, mschmidt(a)redhat.com,
redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, suraia(a)ikkoku.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 1.8.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.8.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.7.3-2.fc39
URL: https://gajim.org/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/870/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gajim
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2210415
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305674
Bug ID: 2305674
Summary: Move rubygem-asciidoctor to RHEL CRB
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: rubygem-asciidoctor
Assignee: dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com
Reporter: mkoncek(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com,
epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
logans(a)cottsay.net, mjg(a)fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
rubygem-asciidoctor is a generally useful package for building many projects
including other packages present in RHEL CRB. Currently this package is present
in the EPEL repository. However using it requires including extra repositories
on the consumer's side.
This bug is to discuss the feasibility of moving the package to the CRB variant
and discontinuing the EPEL version in RHEL 9.
Example: CI of a package used for building Java packages in RHELs and Fedoras
(currently uses the Buildroot repository, could have used EPEL):
https://github.com/fedora-java/jurand/blob/b9c5df76d3c59204c2683a268a6cd4f6…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305674
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…