https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278076

Bug ID: 2278076 Summary: Rebuild against LibRaw 0.21.1 in RHEL 9.4 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: OpenImageIO Keywords: Reopened Assignee: hobbes1069@gmail.com Reporter: carl@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: carl@redhat.com, debarshir@redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org, extras-qa@fedoraproject.org, hobbes1069@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2245057 +++

LibRaw was recently rebased to 0.21.1 in CentOS Stream 9 aimed at RHEL 9.4: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-768

This alters the sonames exported by LibRaw, and therefore OpenImageIO needs to be rebuilt against the new sonames.

To fix this for CentOS Stream 9 users, before RHEL 9.4 is released, we need an epel9-next branch for OpenImageIO: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-about-next/

--- Additional comment from Carl George 🤠 on 2023-11-22 03:25:05 UTC ---

Friendly ping, this blocks CentOS Stream 9 users with this package installed from fully updating their systems, or installing other packages that link against the latest LibRaw. If a maintainer can request the epel9-next branch, I can complete the necessary rebuild. A scratch build based on the epel9 branch completed successfully.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109379868

--- Additional comment from Fedora Update System on 2023-11-22 05:32:00 UTC ---

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-639e141f60 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-639e141f60

--- Additional comment from Richard Shaw on 2023-11-22 13:59:38 UTC ---

Thanks for the reminder. Update submitted.

--- Additional comment from Fedora Update System on 2023-11-23 03:01:55 UTC ---

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-639e141f60 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-639e141f60

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

--- Additional comment from Carl George 🤠 on 2023-11-30 05:43:46 UTC ---

This update installs fine on RHEL, but doesn't resolve the issue in this bug. It is simple to reproduce on CentOS Stream 9.

dnf install OpenImageIO dnf update

Error: Problem: package OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.el9.x86_64 from @System requires libraw_r.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9.x86_64 from @System - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and LibRaw-0.20.2-4.el9.x86_64 from appstream - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and LibRaw-0.20.2-5.el9.x86_64 from appstream - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9.x86_64 from appstream - cannot install the best update candidate for package OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.el9.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9.x86_64

An epel9-next branch must be requested so that an EPEL 9 Next build can be created that properly links against libraw_r.so.23. Please run the following commands from within the cloned dist-git repo:

fedpkg request-branch epel9-next (wait a few minutes for the branch to be created) git fetch git switch epel9-next git merge epel9 git push fedpkg build fedpkg update --type bugfix --notes "Rebuilt for LibRaw soname change" --bugs 2245057

This will give us separate OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.el9 and OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.el9.next builds, for RHEL and CentOS respectively. When that LibRaw change lands in RHEL 9.4, the epel9 branch can have the release bumped to 2, which will be a proper upgrade path for both RHEL and CentOS users.

--- Additional comment from Debarshi Ray on 2023-11-30 13:17:48 UTC ---

(In reply to Carl George 🤠 from comment #5)

This update installs fine on RHEL, but doesn't resolve the issue in this bug. It is simple to reproduce on CentOS Stream 9.

Thanks for the testing, Carl! Reopening.

--- Additional comment from Fedora Update System on 2023-12-01 02:15:26 UTC ---

FEDORA-EPEL-2023-639e141f60 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

--- Additional comment from Richard Shaw on 2023-12-01 13:13:56 UTC ---

Posting the new error would help as I don't know why a rebuild wouldn't fix it.

--- Additional comment from Debarshi Ray on 2023-12-01 15:04:46 UTC ---

(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #8)

Posting the new error would help as I don't know why a rebuild wouldn't fix it.

Please, see comment 5. Carl already explained it. OpenImageIO needs a epel9-next, and that's where it should be rebuilt against the LibRaw that's in CentOS Stream 9.

--- Additional comment from Carl George 🤠 on 2023-12-01 18:03:01 UTC ---

Posting the new error would help as I don't know why a rebuild wouldn't fix it.

The new build was built against RHEL 9 and libraw_r.so.20 (LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9). CentOS Stream 9 now has libraw_r.so.23 (LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9). It is planned for RHEL 9 to get libraw_r.so.23 next year. Normally packages built against RHEL work on both RHEL and CentOS, however in situations like this where a library soname is different for a period of time, maintainers need to do an additional build in EPEL Next. This is explained in further detail in the EPEL Next documentation.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-about-next/

As a proven packager, I can resolve this for you, I just can't request the epel9-next branch because I'm not a maintainer of the package. If you run `fedpkg request-branch epel9-next`, I'll take care of the rest. Alternatively, if you give the epel-packagers-sig group commit or collaborator access to the package, that will allow me to request the branch myself.

--- Additional comment from Richard Shaw on 2023-12-01 23:39:15 UTC ---

I've added epel-packagers-sig as a collaborator to epel* and requested the branch, see: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/58580

--- Additional comment from Fedora Update System on 2023-12-02 06:34:02 UTC ---

FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-9fb0826d21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9 Next. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-9fb0826d21

--- Additional comment from Fedora Update System on 2023-12-03 01:56:30 UTC ---

FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-9fb0826d21 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 Next testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-9fb0826d21

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

--- Additional comment from Fedora Update System on 2023-12-11 01:41:46 UTC ---

FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-9fb0826d21 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 Next stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.