https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256713
Bug ID: 2256713 Summary: Please branch and build ImageMagick in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: ImageMagick Assignee: luya_tfz@thefinalzone.net Reporter: bzuelly@gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: blaise@gmail.com, davide@cavalca.name, epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org, fedora@famillecollet.com, luya_tfz@thefinalzone.net, michel@michel-slm.name, ngompa13@gmail.com, pampelmuse@gmx.at, sergio@serjux.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build ImageMagick in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256713
Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca davide@cavalca.name --- ImageMagick is already in EPEL 9, and has been for a while now. See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=&packages=ImageMagick&am... for the latest updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256713
--- Comment #3 from Bryan Zuelly bzuelly@gmail.com --- I was hoping for ImageMagick 7.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256713
--- Comment #4 from Sergio Basto sergio@serjux.com --- if you need IM7 please look at remi repos https://rpms.remirepo.net/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256713
Carl George 🤠 carl@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please branch and build |update ImageMagick to |ImageMagick in epel9 |version 7 in epel9 CC| |carl@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256713
--- Comment #5 from Carl George 🤠 carl@redhat.com --- ImageMagick is tricky when it comes to library stability. Even going from 6.9.11.x to 6.9.12.x involves a library soname change. Upgrading to version 7 would be even more disruptive and not in line with the EPEL updates policy.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy/
If the maintainers want to pursue this in spite of the risk, we have the EPEL incompatible upgrade process to do it deliberately and carefully.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256713
--- Comment #6 from Carl George 🤠 carl@redhat.com --- This is actually even less predictable than I thought. I originally compared Fedora builds of 6.9.11.27 and 6.9.12.25 and assumed that the third section moving from 11 to 12 was when the library soname changed from 6 to 7. It actually changed going from 6.9.11.60 to 6.9.11.61.
https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick6/compare/6.9.11-60...6.9.11-61 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick6/commit/8b4078682b9fd4988ea44d077...
It remains true that upgrading to anything version 7 will be a drastic change that is generally inappropriate for EPEL.
epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com