https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
Bug ID: 2079295 Summary: Busybox requires ld-musl-x86_64.so.1, but must be static Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: busybox Severity: medium Assignee: spotrh@gmail.com Reporter: atu@nmetau.edu.ua QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: admiller@redhat.com, dcavalca@fb.com, dvlasenk@redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: Busybox is a special binary, which must be static. However, it requires so from musl library.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): busybox-1:1.35.0-4.fc37.x86_64
How reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -Uvh --test busybox-1.35.0-4.fc37.x86_64.rpm
Actual results: error: Failed dependencies: ld-musl-x86_64.so.1()(64bit) is needed by busybox-1:1.35.0-4.fc37.x86_64
Expected results: Clean install without dependencies from any library.
Additional info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
Jonas Ådahl jadahl@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC| |jadahl@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Jonas Ådahl jadahl@redhat.com --- This issue breaks using `virtme-run` with -script-sh or -script-exec, as that works by copying the assumingly static /usr/sbin/busybox into a initramfs where it will assume it'll work without external shared objects. It doesn't, however, unless one *also* copies /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 into /lib in the initramfs. Doing that, I'd say is a work around, one should be able to assume /usr/sbin/busybox is a static executable, can one not, assuming no busybox-shared etc is installed.
This applies to F36 too. Should I clone this bug for F36?
Some other observations:
In F35, `ldd /usr/sbin/busybox` gives me "not a dynamic executable" while on F36 I get
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc89161000) ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 => /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 (0x00007fa94925e000)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
Marcos Mello marcosfrm@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcosfrm@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Marcos Mello marcosfrm@gmail.com --- From busybox-1.35.0-4.fc36.x86_64:
$ rpm -qi busybox | grep Summary Summary : Statically linked binary providing simplified versions of system commands
$ rpm -qlv busybox | grep /usr/sbin lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 abr 8 2022 /usr/lib/.build-id/31/dce81049eeba32603072cedae67e731390c0e3 -> ../../../../usr/sbin/busybox -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1245312 abr 8 2022 /usr/sbin/busybox lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 abr 8 2022 /usr/sbin/busybox.musl.static -> ./busybox
$ ldd /usr/sbin/busybox linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe90ee9000) ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 => /lib/ld-musl-x86_64.so.1 (0x00007f4f4f6aa000)
Not static at all. :(
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
--- Comment #4 from Michael Hofmann mhofmann@redhat.com --- As another data point, this broke the upgrade of the RH kernel CI infrastructure from FC35 -> FC37 as the busybox executable was used standalone 😂.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-9483e38187 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9483e38187
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-9483e38187 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9483e38187
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-9483e38187 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-9483e38187` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9483e38187
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
Tom "spot" Callaway spotrh@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbash@jbash.com
--- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway spotrh@gmail.com --- *** Bug 2160300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
--- Comment #10 from Anton Guda atu@nmetau.edu.ua --- Seems all Ok. Propose to close this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |busybox-1.36.0-1.fc37 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed| |2023-01-19 06:10:23
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-9483e38187 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|busybox-1.36.0-1.fc37 |busybox-1.36.0-1.fc37 | |busybox-1.36.0-1.fc36
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2023-742d00d24e has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com