[Bug 2259530] New: python-lmdb fails to build with Python 3.13: implicit declaration of function ‘PyObject_AsReadBuffer’
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Bug ID: 2259530 Summary: python-lmdb fails to build with Python 3.13: implicit declaration of function ‘PyObject_AsReadBuffer’ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-lmdb Assignee: pspacek@isc.org Reporter: ksurma@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org, jakub.ruzicka@nic.cz, jonathan@almalinux.org, ksurma@redhat.com, mhroncok@redhat.com, pspacek@isc.org, python-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2244836 (PYTHON3.13) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
python-lmdb fails to build with Python 3.13.0a3.
lmdb/cpython.c: In function ‘val_from_buffer’: lmdb/cpython.c:586:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘PyObject_AsReadBuffer’; did you mean ‘PyObject_GetBuffer’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 586 | return PyObject_AsReadBuffer(buf, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | PyObject_GetBuffer
https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html
For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-ra...
For all our attempts to build python-lmdb with Python 3.13, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/python-l...
Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/
Let us know here if you have any questions.
Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836 [Bug 2244836] Python 3.13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Karolina Surma ksurma@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2260877 | |(F41FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEF | |ailsToInstall), 2291985 CC| |fti-bugs@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #2 from Karolina Surma ksurma@redhat.com --- *** Bug 2291762 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260877 [Bug 2260877] Fedora 41 Fails To install Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291985 [Bug 2291985] F41FailsToInstall: python3-zarr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Github | |jnwatson/py-lmdb/issues/362 CC| |awilliam@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com --- This one looks difficult...at least for a non-C-expert like me. see https://github.com/jnwatson/py-lmdb/issues/362 .
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Elliott Sales de Andrade quantum.analyst@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2291987
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291987 [Bug 2291987] F41FailsToInstall: python3-zict
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2261618 CC| |zbyszek@in.waw.pl
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261618 [Bug 2261618] python-zarr: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2261618 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261618 [Bug 2261618] python-zarr: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Fedora Fails To Install fti-bugs@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(pspacek@isc.org)
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Fails To Install fti-bugs@fedoraproject.org --- Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/
This package fails to install and maintainers are advised to take one of the following actions:
- Fix this bug and close this bugzilla once the update makes it to the repository. (The same script that posted this comment will eventually close this bugzilla when the fixed package reaches the repository, so you don't have to worry about it.)
or
- Move this bug to ASSIGNED if you plan on fixing this, but simply haven't done so yet.
or
- Orphan the package if you no longer plan to maintain it.
If you do not take one of these actions, the process at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_... will continue. This package may be orphaned in 7+ weeks. This is the first reminder (step 3) from the policy.
Don't hesitate to ask for help on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ if you are unsure how to fix this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Petr Špaček pspacek@isc.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|pspacek@isc.org |python-sig@lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Petr Špaček pspacek@isc.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(pspacek@isc.org) |
--- Comment #5 from Petr Špaček pspacek@isc.org --- I'm not interested in maintaining this package anymore - reassigning.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|python-sig@lists.fedoraproj |jakub.ruzicka@nic.cz |ect.org |
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- (In reply to Petr Špaček from comment #5)
I'm not interested in maintaining this package anymore - reassigning.
You were marked as the Bugzilla contact for this package. I reset this to the main admin @jruzicka.
No point in reassigning this bugzilla to python-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org, please don't do that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Fedora Fails To Install fti-bugs@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(jakub.ruzicka@nic | |.cz)
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Fails To Install fti-bugs@fedoraproject.org --- Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/
This package fails to install and maintainers are advised to take one of the following actions:
- Fix this bug and close this bugzilla once the update makes it to the repository. (The same script that posted this comment will eventually close this bugzilla when the fixed package reaches the repository, so you don't have to worry about it.)
or
- Move this bug to ASSIGNED if you plan on fixing this, but simply haven't done so yet.
or
- Orphan the package if you no longer plan to maintain it.
If you do not take one of these actions, the process at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_... will continue. This package may be orphaned in 7+ weeks. This is the first reminder (step 3) from the policy.
Don't hesitate to ask for help on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ if you are unsure how to fix this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Fails To Install fti-bugs@fedoraproject.org --- Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/
This package fails to install and maintainers are advised to take one of the following actions:
- Fix this bug and close this bugzilla once the update makes it to the repository. (The same script that posted this comment will eventually close this bugzilla when the fixed package reaches the repository, so you don't have to worry about it.)
or
- Move this bug to ASSIGNED if you plan on fixing this, but simply haven't done so yet.
or
- Orphan the package if you no longer plan to maintain it.
If you do not take one of these actions, the process at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_... will continue. This package may be orphaned in 4+ weeks. This is the second reminder (step 4) from the policy.
Don't hesitate to ask for help on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ if you are unsure how to fix this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Fedora Fails To Install fti-bugs@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jakub.ruzicka@nic | |.cz) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Fedora Fails To Install fti-bugs@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(jakub.ruzicka@nic | |.cz)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Jakub Ruzicka jakub.ruzicka@nic.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jakub.ruzicka@nic | |.cz) | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Ruzicka jakub.ruzicka@nic.cz --- This will require upstream fix as discussed in https://github.com/jnwatson/py-lmdb/issues/362
I'll make a new release once new upstream release (or at least merged fix) is available.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Karolina Surma ksurma@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(jakub.ruzicka@nic | |.cz)
--- Comment #10 from Karolina Surma ksurma@redhat.com --- This package has failed to build with Python 3.13 so far. Fedora 41 is already in the Beta Freeze phase. What's your plan going forward? Will the package be fixed in time for the Final Freeze of Fedora 41 (planned on Oct 15th 2024)? If you don't plan or can't fix the package before Fedora 41 goes into the Final Freeze phase, please retire the package. You can unretire it anytime during the Fedora 41 lifecycle - doing this now will simply ensure that we don't release Fedora with a broken package. Thank you!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
--- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com --- There isn't much Jakub can do about this. I've looked at the issue so I know. It requires *significant* change upstream to fix this without leaking. It's not something we can appropriately do on our own initiative downstream. We could theoretically do it and contribute it upstream, but it involves significant surgery to the fundamental design of the relevant code flow upstream, which the maintainer is more likely to want to do themselves than take as a contribution. And it's more engineering than we can realistically expect a packager to do (and more than I'm capable of in a reasonable timeframe). See the discussion at https://github.com/jnwatson/py-lmdb/issues/362#issuecomment-2168711185 .
We...*could* use my incorrect patch that leaks buffers, I guess. I don't actually know how awful the practical impact of that is.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
--- Comment #12 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- I took a look at the code and came up with https://github.com/jnwatson/py-lmdb/issues/362#issuecomment-2329560855
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Github | |jnwatson/py-lmdb/pull/368
--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- Actually... https://github.com/jnwatson/py-lmdb/pull/368
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2247866 | |(BetaFreezeException,F41Bet | |aFreezeException)
--- Comment #14 from Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com --- Thanks a lot, that looks good to me. I'd be in favor of going ahead with that. Also proposing as an FE for F41 Beta so we can get it fixed there.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247866 [Bug 2247866] Fedora 41 Beta freeze exception bug tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
František Zatloukal fzatlouk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fzatlouk@redhat.com Whiteboard| |AcceptedFreezeException
--- Comment #15 from František Zatloukal fzatlouk@redhat.com --- Discussed during the 2024-09-09 blocker review meeting: [1]
The decision to classify this bug as a AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) was made:
"Once again, accepted as a fails-to-install issue, which we typically accept to avoid upgrade issues."
[1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/blocker-review_matrix_fedoraproject-org/20...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-a075d56589 (python-lmdb-1.4.1-2.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-a075d56589
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |python-lmdb-1.4.1-2.fc42 Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Last Closed| |2024-09-11 13:11:47
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-a075d56589 (python-lmdb-1.4.1-2.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-a809260e4b (python-lmdb-1.4.1-1.fc39) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-a809260e4b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-0681840c5c (python-lmdb-1.4.1-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0681840c5c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-0681840c5c (python-lmdb-1.4.1-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0681840c5c
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-edd7b14708 (python-lmdb-1.4.1-2.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-edd7b14708
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |MODIFIED Flags|needinfo?(jakub.ruzicka@nic | |.cz) | Resolution|ERRATA |--- Keywords| |Reopened
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-edd7b14708 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-edd7b14708` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-edd7b14708
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259530
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|python-lmdb-1.4.1-2.fc42 |python-lmdb-1.4.1-2.fc42 | |python-lmdb-1.4.1-2.fc41 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed|2024-09-11 13:11:47 |2024-09-13 04:32:04
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-2024-edd7b14708 (python-lmdb-1.4.1-2.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com