https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Bug ID: 1206714 Summary: CVE-2015-2774 erlang: Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation [epel-all] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: erlang Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: high Priority: high Assignee: rjones@redhat.com Reporter: fleite@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: erlang@lists.fedoraproject.org, gemi@bluewin.ch, rjones@redhat.com, s@shk.io Blocks: 1206712 (CVE-2015-2774)
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206712 [Bug 1206712] CVE-2015-2774 Erlang/OTP is vulnerable to Poodle in its TLS-1.0 implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Olive Leite fleite@redhat.com ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated bugs get updated when new packages are pushed to stable.
=====
# bugfix, security, enhancement, newpackage (required) type=security
# testing, stable request=testing
# Bug numbers: 1234,9876 bugs=1206712,1206714
# Description of your update notes=Security fix for CVE-2015-2774
# Enable request automation based on the stable/unstable karma thresholds autokarma=True stable_karma=3 unstable_karma=-3
# Automatically close bugs when this marked as stable close_bugs=True
# Suggest that users restart after update suggest_reboot=False
======
Additionally, you may opt to use the bodhi update submission link instead:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=1206712...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeckersb@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- Adding Rabbit maintainer just FYI.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dac@cafaro.net Whiteboard| |fst_owner=dcafaro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #3 from David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net --- Just checking in on the status of this patch?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #4 from David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net --- Looking upstream it appears a patch for this was added in Release 17.5 and later.
http://www.erlang.org/download/otp_src_17.5.readme
"OTP-12420 Application(s): ssl
*** POTENTIAL INCOMPATIBILITY ***
Add padding check for TLS-1.0 to remove Poodle vulnerability from TLS 1.0, also add the option padding_check. This option only affects TLS-1.0 connections and if set to false it disables the block cipher padding check to be able to interoperate with legacy software.
OTP-12458 Application(s): ssl
Add support for TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV used to prevent undesired TLS version downgrades. If used by a client that is vulnerable to the POODLE attack, and the server also supports TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV, the attack can be prevented."
I have not found a back port to the current Release 14 Beta 4 in the repos.
Do we have any status on a fix for this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(rjones@redhat.com | |)
--- Comment #5 from David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net --- Need a status update on this, are there plans to patch?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(rjones@redhat.com |needinfo?(jeckersb@redhat.c |) |om)
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- You probably want to ask the Rabbit maintainer.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(jeckersb@redhat.c | |om)
--- Comment #7 from David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net --- Ping? Need to get this patched.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov@gmail.com Assignee|rjones@redhat.com |lemenkov@gmail.com Flags|needinfo?(jeckersb@redhat.c | |om) | |needinfo?(jeckersb@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- Hello! I'll fix it soon (before or during this weekend).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #9 from David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net --- How goes the patching work?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(lemenkov@gmail.co | |m)
--- Comment #10 from David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net --- Been another week, are you working on it?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|fst_owner=dcafaro |fst_owner=dcafaro, | |fst_ping=2 Flags| |needinfo?(lemenkov@gmail.co | |m)
--- Comment #11 from David A. Cafaro dac@cafaro.net --- Any word on the update for this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(lemenkov@gmail.co | |m) | |needinfo?(lemenkov@gmail.co | |m) |
--- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com --- (In reply to David A. Cafaro from comment #11)
Any word on the update for this?
Sorry still don't have much time for that. If someone can help with backporting that woiuld be very appreciated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #13 from John Eckersberg jeckersb@redhat.com --- (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #12)
(In reply to David A. Cafaro from comment #11)
Any word on the update for this?
Sorry still don't have much time for that. If someone can help with backporting that woiuld be very appreciated.
I'll take a stab at it. I just requested commit access in pkgdb for erlang, so I'll need you or someone else to approve it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
John Eckersberg jeckersb@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|lemenkov@gmail.com |jeckersb@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
John Eckersberg jeckersb@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(rjones@redhat.com | |)
--- Comment #14 from John Eckersberg jeckersb@redhat.com --- Rich, can you approve my commit ACLs for EPEL6/7, looks like Peter can only approve for the Fedora branches:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(rjones@redhat.com | |) |
--- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com --- That should be done now.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #16 from John Eckersberg jeckersb@redhat.com --- I backported the patch from OTP 17 -> R16B03-1, which is what is in EPEL7, and it's currently building. I'll submit the update when it's done.
EPEL6 is on R14B, which I suspect is probably going to be a much more involved, if not nearly impossible backport. I'm going to go look at it now, but there is a high probability that I am going to leave EPEL6 as-is unless somebody really really really wants it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- erlang-R16B-03.11.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-R16B-03.11.el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- Package erlang-R16B-03.11.el7: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing erlang-R16B-03.11.el7' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7562/erlang-R16B-03... then log in and leave karma (feedback).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- erlang-R16B-03.11.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206714
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |R16B-03.11.el7 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2015-09-02 01:55:10
erlang@lists.fedoraproject.org