Yea, definitely I could do that. I can write what the checks mean as I understand each and every check(I still have no clue about many of them). But its gonna take time I guess. So if someone also wants to help out writing a new wiki you are more than welcome. :)


From: Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@fedoraproject.org>
To: Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@gmail.com>
Cc: Fedora Join Mailing list <fedora-join@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Fedora-join] Review Process

On Friday, October 26, 2012 08:57 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> fedora-review is extremely helpful.

But Sourav's question was to understand how to check things.

fedora-review is an awesome tool (I use it regularly, don't get me wrong), but that won't help him understand how fedora-review checks the things it checks.

For example, if you don't know what "package does not contain static binaries" mean, it won't help you a lot that fedora-review can check for that.

Sourav, here's an idea. Following the long tradition of the Fedora Project being a community of contribution, how about you write the wiki pages you think would be useful? :)

In the process, you will actually learn how to perform these checks you are wondering about, and you will create a useful resource for future contributors.

Does that sound like something you can do?

Of course, if you start it and feel lost, don't hesitate to ask specific questions on the points you're blocking on. ;)


-- Mathieu
fedora-join mailing list