Dear Fedora Review developers,<div><br></div><div>When conducting a review I noticed that specs that use the new %license tag to mark the license file get flagged as not having a license text by fedora-review -- this is, as it turns out, because RPM&#39;s -d flag does not display files tagged as licenses; one needs the exclusive -L flag to display that.</div><div><br></div><div>This patch runs rpm twice, once with -d and once with -L, and collect the candidate files from both runs. It also drops the redundant -l which both -d and -L imply.</div><div><br></div><div>As tested with:</div><div><a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Reference:</div><div>FPC proposal for using %license instead of %doc</div><div><a href="https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/411">https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/411</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>RPM %license tag handling</div><div><a href="http://www.rpm.org/ticket/116">http://www.rpm.org/ticket/116</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Michel Alexandre Salim</div><div>Fedora Project Contributor (FAS: salimma, IRC: michel_slm)</div>