[Bug 1761885] New: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1761885
Bug ID: 1761885
Summary: rpm -V complains about mode for ghost .uuid files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontpackages
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1564432
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
rpm -Va complains a lot about mode of %ghost .uuid files:
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/paktype-naqsh/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/sil-padauk/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/smc-suruma/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-android-emoji/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/google-crosextra-carlito/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-assamese/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lohit-telugu/.uuid
.M....... g /usr/share/fonts/lilypond/.uuid
.....
Looks like fontpackages-devel template rpmmacro creates .uuid which %ghost
%atttr(0000)
e.g.
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qlv google-droid-sans-fonts | grep uuid
---------- 1 root root 0 7月 25 23:03
/usr/share/fonts/google-droid/.uuid
ref:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontpackages/blob/master/f/fontpackage...
but I guess %transfiletriggerin script by fontconfig creates .uuid as 0755
permission (perhaps)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-25.fc31.noarch
fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.x86_64
fontconfig-2.13.92-3.fc31.i686
google-droid-sans-fonts-20120715-16.fc31.noarch
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above, try $ rpm -Va
2.
3.
Actual results:
See above, lots of .uuid permission complaint
Expected results:
No complaint by rpm -Va
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 month, 3 weeks
[Bug 1727602] New: Fedora flatpak for this app on
registry.fedoraproject.org
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727602
Bug ID: 1727602
Summary: Fedora flatpak for this app on
registry.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fontforge
Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com
Reporter: 7d28c752(a)opayq.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
It would be great if you could provide a flatpak package of this app to
https://registry.fedoraproject.org/.
Especially for users of Fedora Silverblue https://silverblue.fedoraproject.org/
this then allows a seamless installation and upgrades without rebooting the
system (just restarting the application).
Additionally, flatpaks can of course be installed on any distro, so also
non-Fedora users could use it too.
More details:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Flatpaks
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_Applications_as_Flatpaks
I know this app is available on Flathub as a flatpak, but I still prefer
Fedora's package testing/QA etc., that's why I'd also like to have a version on
https://registry.fedoraproject.org/. Also Flathub is a third-party source from
the Fedora users/projects viewpoint, so I guess some users would not like to
use third-party app sources.
However, the fact that it is on Flathub should make it easier for you to
implement this, because you can have a look on how they do it. (Not that you
need to do everything in the same way, but it proves it is possible to package
as a flatpak, at least.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 months, 3 weeks
[Bug 1779123] New: Pango no longer supports type1 fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779123
Bug ID: 1779123
Summary: Pango no longer supports type1 fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mjg(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
In pango 1.44, pango dropped support for type1 fonts. Therefore, no application
which uses pango for font loading can use type1 fonts any more.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-1.44.6-1.fc31.x86_64 (and later)
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upgrade F31 or rawhide
2. Open any pango-using application
3. Try to use type1 font
Actual results:
No type1 font is usable
Expected results:
Type1 font is usable
Additional info:
bug 1753295 is the same bug for dropped bitmap font support. Over there,
workarounds specific for bitmap fonts (conversion to opentype bitmap fonts) are
discussed. An attempt to discuss type1 there failed.
This bug here is specifically about type1 fonts to discuss ways (or their
absence) to deal with pangos dropped type 1 support.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 months, 4 weeks
[Bug 1678974] New: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678974
Bug ID: 1678974
Summary: libfontenc-1.1.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: libfontenc
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: btissoir(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, btissoir(a)redhat.com,
caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, caolanm(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.1.4
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.1.3-10.fc30
URL: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/lib/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/1613/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 year, 5 months
[Bug 1784650] New: Fontconfig is slow, causing stuttering and
freezing
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784650
Bug ID: 1784650
Summary: Fontconfig is slow, causing stuttering and freezing
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Severity: high
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bepvte+bugzilla(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Fontconfig is much much slower than on other distros, and it stutters or
freezes applications that use it.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Name : fontconfig
Version : 2.13.92
Release : 3.fc31
Architecture: x86_64
How reproducible:
I can reproduce this bug on a fresh Fedora 31 vm with the Xfce desktop and
google-noto-sans-* fonts installed.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install google-noto-sans-*
2. run gedit on the attached example file
alternatively
1. dnf install google-noto-sans-*
2. open firefox and browse to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q52 (page with lots
of languages)
Actual results:
It takes around 60 seconds for gedit to become responsive to scrolling and
input. Mousepad is faster but still slow.
It takes firefox upwards of 5 minutes to get to first paint on a page with many
fonts or languages, compared to a simpler page.
Expected results:
Gedit should load files with many fonts at a similar speed as other distros.
The page should load quickly, like on Debian and others.
Additional info:
I have tried to diagnose the source of this issue in many ways.
Running `perf trace` on what sysprof indicated was the most busy function
(FcStrCmpIgnoreCaseAndDelims), shows that every name of every font family is
being compared to every other name of every other font family. I do not know if
this is a normal behaviour of fontconfig.
I have noticed the amount of calls to "FcStrCmpIgnoreCaseAndDelims" and program
startup time both drop to a similar amount as Debian's when all of the
"google-noto" configuration files in /etc/fonts/conf.d/ are deleted (These
files are not present in Debian). However, this might not be the source of the
problem:
In the Debian vm, with a copy of my computer's /etc/fonts/, including the
google-noto files, (I took care to ensure that there would be no broken
symlinks) and /usr/share/fonts, fontconfig does not stall any programs. The
amount of calls to FcStrCmpIgnoreCaseAndDelims is also much lower as well.
This led me to believe that it was a difference caused by compiler flags but
this does not seem to be the case. I tried to replace the optflags in the
package, except for the rpmbuild required debug ones, and found no difference.
I also checked to ensure that it was not caused by GCC version differences.
Debian results for mousepad:
1,845,449 calls to FcStrCmpIgnoreCaseAndDelims
Time: 5 seconds
Fedora results for mousepad:
11,658,380 calls to FcStrCmpIgnoreCaseAndDelims
Time: 23 seconds
https://perfht.ml/2tleJxN
Here is a link to a Firefox profiler result of the wikidata page, where in the
flame graph you can see that Firefox is spending most of its time in
fontconfig. You can also see "FirstNonBlankPaint" is at 50 seconds in the
marker table.
TLDR: Fontconfig matching is slow with all google-noto fonts installed, unless
you remove the noto config files. Using the same exact font directory and
config directory (including the noto config files) on Debian does not cause the
same problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 1 month
[Bug 1806272] New: forge-font macro transition causes broken
dependencies
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806272
Bug ID: 1806272
Summary: forge-font macro transition causes broken dependencies
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: dejavu-fonts
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: decathorpe(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
peter(a)thecodergeek.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
With the transition to new forge-based fonts macros, the -common subpackage was
dropped, but some packages depend on that. They are now not installable on
fedora 32+ because that package is gone (only Obsoleted, not Provided).
This affects at least python3-weasyprint.
Additionally, the sdljava-demo package now has broken dependencies as well:
- /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf
- /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf
- /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf
- /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf
Probably those files were renamed with the forge macro transition.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 2 months
[Bug 1753020] New: Powerline symbols no longer align
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753020
Bug ID: 1753020
Summary: Powerline symbols no longer align
Product: Fedora
Version: 30
Status: NEW
Component: terminus-font
Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: andrew(a)linuxjedi.co.uk
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhbugs(a)n-dimensional.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1615993
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1615993&action=edit
Screenshot of zsh+om-my-zsh using powerline-fonts and terminus-fonts 4.48
Description of problem:
With version 4.48 of the Terminus font the powerline symbols no longer align
for sizes less than 14pt
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
terminus-fonts-4.48-1.fc30.noarch
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install terminus-fonts and powerline-fonts.
2. Use something with powerline (zsh, vim, etc...)
3. Update to the latest terminus-fonts version
4. Use powerline things again
Actual results:
Bad symbol alignment
Expected results:
Good symbol alignment
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 4 months
[Bug 1786596] New: Vertical alignment is off with PANGO_GRAVITY_EAST
and PANGO_GRAVITY_HINT_LINE
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786596
Bug ID: 1786596
Summary: Vertical alignment is off with PANGO_GRAVITY_EAST and
PANGO_GRAVITY_HINT_LINE
Product: Fedora
Version: 31
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: pango
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: abetakehiko(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Japanese chars and Latin chars in the same line do not vertically align when
the pango context's gravity is set to PANGO_GRAVITY_EAST and its hint set to
PANGO_GRAVITY_HINT_LINE.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-1.44.7-1.fc31.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
pango-view --text="あーいうえお abcde" --gravity east --gravity-hint line
--font="NotoSerifJP 24"
Actual results:
Japanese chars and Latin chars in the same line do not vertically align.
Expected results:
Japanese chars and Latin chars in the same line vertically align as before.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 7 months
[Bug 1752788] New: CVE-2015-9381 freetype: a heap-based buffer
over-read in T1_Get_Private_Dict in type1/t1parse.c leading to information
disclosure
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752788
Bug ID: 1752788
Summary: CVE-2015-9381 freetype: a heap-based buffer over-read
in T1_Get_Private_Dict in type1/t1parse.c leading to
information disclosure
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mrehak(a)redhat.com
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Other
FreeType before 2.6.1 has a heap-based buffer over-read in T1_Get_Private_Dict
in type1/t1parse.c.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 10 months
[Bug 1774474] New: Missing some coverage in certain variants
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774474
Bug ID: 1774474
Summary: Missing some coverage in certain variants
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: dejavu-fonts
Severity: low
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
peter(a)thecodergeek.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I'm expecting to see same glyph coverage to all variants available in the
package but apparently not. this is just a result running some test cases with
fc-validate against languages which is expectedly or unexpectedly supposed to
assign dejavu as a default font for.
See logs stored in the following link for more details. that demonstrates this
issue.
https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org/blue/rest/organizatio...
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.37-2.fc31
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.fc-validate -l <lang> /path/to/fonts
2.
3.
Actual results:
(One of) snippet from logs:
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf satisfy ab language coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf satisfy ab language coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf satisfy ab language coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: FAIL:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf doesn't satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf satisfy ab language coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] RESULT: PASS:
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf satisfy ab language
coverage.
[2019-11-19T14:20:10.928Z] Run test ab: done. Test's exit code: 0
Expected results:
ExtraLight should have same coverage.
Additional info:
As it is an experimental, this may be an RFE.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years, 11 months