April 2024 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Demand Q2/2024

by Axt＠fedoraproject.org

8 hours, 40 minutes

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2277345] New: NotoSansMono[wght].ttf file name causes scripts with failglob enabled to fail

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277345 Bug ID: 2277345 Summary: NotoSansMono[wght].ttf file name causes scripts with failglob enabled to fail Product: Fedora Version: 40 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: google-noto-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: hartsjc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora shopt failglob If set, patterns which fail to match filenames during pathname expansion result in an expansion error. Using this feature is good practice in scripts as helps prevent scripting mistakes; however, having file name with square brackets causes failures. And with Fedora 40 upgrade seems google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch has added one with: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Causes globs that don't expand to cause errors $ shopt -s failglob 2. Try use files from rpm as variable, and fail $ for file in $(rpm -q --list google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts) ; do [[ -f "/${file}" ]] || echo "${file}" done -bash: no match: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf 3. Note the RC $ echo $? 1 4. Or even command line $ rpm -qf /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf -bash: no match: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf $ rpm -qf '/usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf' google-noto-sans-mono-vf-fonts-20240301-2.fc40.noarch Actual Results: -bash: no match: /usr/share/fonts/google-noto-vf/NotoSansMono[wght].ttf Expected Results: no error accessing files with failglob shopt enabled started fedora 40 upgrade, as daily script of mine fails because this file is included in initramfs too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277345 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

1 day, 4 hours

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2253923] [abrt] setroubleshoot: _FcObjectLookupOtherTypeByName(): python3.12 killed by SIGABRT

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923 Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed| |2024-04-23 03:30:51 --- Comment #16 from Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks for your comment. Please do keep reporting bugs as and when you find them. But good to add one more comment to bug about what were you doing when that bug occurred. This will help us to follow same steps to reproduce reported bug. Bugs detected by Fedora shows how many times its detected. So if you find count more than 1 time bug is detected then you can try to remember what were you doing that might have caused that bug detected by Fedora on your system. Right now I am closing this bug as there is not much information available on how to reproduce this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2253923] [abrt] setroubleshoot: _FcObjectLookupOtherTypeByName(): python3.12 killed by SIGABRT

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923 Sylvain Arth <sylvain(a)gwenved.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(sylvain(a)gwenved.o | |rg) | --- Comment #15 from Sylvain Arth <sylvain(a)gwenved.org> --- I'd like to answer, to the question "How to reproduce" because I really can't. Nowadays; all my Fedora OS machines are running as virtual machines on two different Windows servers. The main purpose of those instances is to act as servers for mails, DNS, NTP and many other usual servers like that. Punctually, I use them for comparison about possibly different behaviour about "mock-up software" of my personal coding in Ada complied with GNAT. In other words, I usually just check by emails that all those V-machines and servers are still in good health. I very rarely fall into the bug I reported, whilst I'm currently doing anything on. Most of the time, It's after reboot-startup (clean or dirty because of some failure of the hosting PC), at login time I get the warning about bugs detected by Fedora. I could ignore them, but my thought is that it could help bug solving, with providing more data, even "raw" ones. I very know this is not quite at all the best bug reporting way. But I also know (I was famous about that prior I retired) my "bug catcher" reputation. In other words, I tend to fall into bug traps other people never fall in. I ignore why about this, I just know it's a fact. I just suspect it's because I've my own way to do things that is often not the "most common way to do things". But if my reports are rather totally useless, just tell me that's the actual case. If so, I will totally stop top sending such kind of reports, to only report those I'm able to tell something like a clue about "how to reproduce, possibly". Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

1 week, 1 day

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2272857] New: fontawesome-fonts-6.5.2 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272857 Bug ID: 2272857 Summary: fontawesome-fonts-6.5.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fontawesome-fonts Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pvoborni(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, loganjerry(a)gmail.com, mrunge(a)redhat.com, pvoborni(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 6.5.2 Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.5.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.5.1-3.fc40 URL: http://fontawesome.io Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/826/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontawesome-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272857 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

1 week, 3 days

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 1580458] [ta_IN] Error in latest Tamil ttf

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580458 Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|38 |40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580458

1 week, 4 days

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2253923] [abrt] setroubleshoot: _FcObjectLookupOtherTypeByName(): python3.12 killed by SIGABRT

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923 Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(sylvain(a)gwenved.o | |rg) --- Comment #14 from Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> --- how to reproduce this reported issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253923 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

2 weeks, 1 day

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2274629] New: Please branch and build artwiz-aleczapka-fonts in epel9

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274629 Bug ID: 2274629 Summary: Please branch and build artwiz-aleczapka-fonts in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts Assignee: dchen(a)redhat.com Reporter: davide(a)cavalca.name QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com Blocks: 1914423 (EPELPackagersSIG) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Please branch and build artwiz-aleczapka-fonts in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain artwiz-aleczapka-fonts in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914423 [Bug 1914423] Tracker for epel-packagers-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274629 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

2 weeks, 4 days

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2273774] New: fonttools-4.51.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273774 Bug ID: 2273774 Summary: fonttools-4.51.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 4.51.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 4.51.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 4.50.0-1.fc41 URL: https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7388/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonttools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2273774 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

2 weeks, 6 days

1
4
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs April 2024