[Bug 2258723] New: Variable fonts packages dont include all axis
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258723
Bug ID: 2258723
Summary: Variable fonts packages dont include all axis
Product: Fedora
Version: 39
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Keywords: RFE
Severity: low
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: sharpenedblade(a)proton.me
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The *-vf packages package files from the `slim-variable-ttf` dir, which do not
include every axis available for the font. Variable font files with all
supported axis are in `variable-ttf` dir instead.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install `google-noto-sans-vf`
2. Check which axis are supported
3. Download
`https://github.com/notofonts/notofonts.github.io/archive/refs/tags/noto-monthly-release-23.8.1.tar.gz`
and look in the `fonts/NotoSans/unhinted/variable-ttf` direcotry
Actual Results:
Only the weight axis is variable in this package
Expected Results:
The weight and width axis are variable in this package
Changing the path at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-noto-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/googl...
works for every variable font/script except for NotoKufiArabic, which has the
complete font files in the `variable` dir.
Before compression, this is ~16mb larger than before (total, across all
subpackages).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258723
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...
1 day, 15 hours
[Bug 2281473] New: Bundle all Adobe Source fonts into a single
package like ibm-plex-fonts-all
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281473
Bug ID: 2281473
Summary: Bundle all Adobe Source fonts into a single package
like ibm-plex-fonts-all
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts
Keywords: Desktop, FutureFeature
Severity: low
Assignee: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com
Reporter: sbnavi20(a)proton.me
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mavit(a)mavit.org.uk, pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Adobe Source is personally my font of choice for interfaces and I'm glad it is
available on Fedora repositories.
Right now, the Adobe Source font family is fragmented in several packages.
adobe-source-code-pro-fonts
adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts
adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts
adobe-source-han-mono-fonts
adobe-source-han-sans-cn-fonts
adobe-source-han-sans-twhk-fonts
adobe-source-han-sans-jp-fonts
adobe-source-han-code-jp-fonts
adobe-source-han-sans-kr-fonts
adobe-source-han-sans-tw-fonts
adobe-source-han-serif-cn-fonts
adobe-source-han-serif-jp-fonts
adobe-source-han-serif-kr-fonts
adobe-source-han-serif-tw-fonts
I suggest gathering all font packages generated from adobe-source-fonts in a
single package like it is done with ibm-plex-fonts-all.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281473
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...
2 days, 11 hours
[Bug 1999078] New: Hinting broken for Bitstream Vera/DejaVu in
Epiphany
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999078
Bug ID: 1999078
Summary: Hinting broken for Bitstream Vera/DejaVu in Epiphany
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component: freetype
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ossman(a)cendio.se
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mark(a)net-c.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1819062
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819062&action=edit
Screenshot with varying sub pixel placement
Description of problem:
After upgrading from Fedora 33 to Fedora 34, there is some extremely odd
hinting bug in Epiphany. The same glyph appears with different amount of
hinting in the same line of text, causing a very odd and blurry appearance.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freetype-2.10.4-3.fc34.x86_64
bitstream-vera-sans-fonts-1.10-41.fc33.noarch
dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-16.fc34.noarch
epiphany-40.3-1.fc34.x86_64
webkit2gtk3-2.32.3-1.fc34.x86_64
pango-1.48.9-2.fc34.x86_64
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure Epiphany to use Bitstream Vera or DejaVu Sans Book
2. Configure full hinting
Actual results:
Fully hinted, consistent glyphs.
Expected results:
Some glyphs are fully hinted, some look like they've been offset by a fraction
of a pixel. (See screenshot)
Additional info:
So far I'm only seeing this in Epiphany. I still filed this for freetype since
as far as I know it is freetype that does all glyph layout, hinting and
sub-pixel stuff. Feel free to move as appropriate. So it seems odd that a bug
in Epiphany can screw this up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5 days, 4 hours
[Bug 2122022] Review Request: ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts - Terminus TTF
is a monospace TrueType Font
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122022
--- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> ---
Sorry for taking a long time and not getting back to you eariler. Here is the
review result:
As a summary, %{SOURCE10} must be renamed to 60-%{fontpkgname}.conf not .xml.
this file is installed on the system as it is though, fontconfig can't read it.
otherwise it looks good to me.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "SIL Open Font License 1.1", "SIL Open Font License 1.0".
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/var/home/tagoh/2122022-ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /etc/fonts, /usr/share/fontconfig, /usr/share,
/usr/share/fonts, /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/metainfo,
/etc/fonts/conf.d, /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail, /usr, /etc
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/fonts,
/usr/share/fontconfig, /usr/share, /usr/share/fonts,
/usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/metainfo, /etc/fonts/conf.d,
/usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail, /usr, /etc
[-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: manually verified.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
fonts:
[x]: Run fc-query on all fonts in package.
Note: manually checked
[?]: Run repo-font-audit on all fonts in package.
Note: Cannot find repo-font-audit, install fontpackages-tools package
to make a comprehensive font review.
See: url: undefined
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts-4.49.3-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts-4.49.3-1.fc41.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp4u617cen')]
checks: 32, packages: 2
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts.noarch: E: spelling-error ('monospace', 'Summary(en_US)
monospace -> mono space, mono-space, aerospace')
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts.noarch: E: spelling-error ('px', '%description -l en_US
px -> PX, ox, p')
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts.src: E: spelling-error ('monospace', 'Summary(en_US)
monospace -> mono space, mono-space, aerospace')
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts.src: E: spelling-error ('px', '%description -l en_US px
-> PX, ox, p')
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings, 9 filtered, 4
badness; has taken 0.3 s
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts.noarch: E: spelling-error ('monospace', 'Summary(en_US)
monospace -> mono space, mono-space, aerospace')
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts.noarch: E: spelling-error ('px', '%description -l en_US
px -> PX, ox, p')
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings, 4 filtered, 2
badness; has taken 0.1 s
Source checksums
----------------
https://files.ax86.net/terminus-ttf/files/4.49.3/terminus-ttf-4.49.3.zip :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
0ead921d98d99a4590ffe6cd66dc037fc0a2ceea1c735d866ba73fe058257577
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
0ead921d98d99a4590ffe6cd66dc037fc0a2ceea1c735d866ba73fe058257577
Requires
--------
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
config(ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts)
fontpackages-filesystem
Provides
--------
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts:
ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts
config(ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts)
font(terminus(ttf))
metainfo()
metainfo(org.fedoraproject.ax86-terminus-ttf-fonts.metainfo.xml)
Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2122022
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: fonts, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: R, Ocaml, Java, SugarActivity, PHP, Perl, Haskell, C/C++,
Python
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2122022
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...
1 week