Hello,
First I should apologize for not discussing this more widely earlier, but
in the i18n subproject we recently suggested and requested that there
should be a generic 'Fonts' component in bugzilla for Fedora since we often
see various generic fonts bugs which take time to determine and resolve and
would easily get lost in the broad 'distribution' component.
See https://pagure.io/i18n/issue/124 and
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9368 for more background.
Currently i18n-bugs is the primary assignee and fonts-bugs is in auto-CC.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&component=Fonts…
I think it can be used in two ways - primarily (long term) for distro wide
fonts issues that are not bugs of a particular component (eg discussions on
changing default fonts, etc) - possibly triaged from some font component,
and secondly when users have no idea what component to file fonts issues
under, which then would need to be triaged to a particular font package.
I don't think we will see a huge number of bugs under this component but it
should be useful for tracking longer term issues and problems. If this also
helps to encourage Fonts SIG activity that would also be a good thing.
Thanks, Jens
If I want to package and submit my font for consideration for inclusion by
Fedora, can I do it?
-Anir
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, 10:58 pm Tom Callaway, <spotrh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Normally, this would be as simple as updating the font packages to use the
> newer versions of the fonts, but I cannot see any font packages in Fedora
> which include these fonts (Ani, Mitramono, MuktiNarrow).
>
> If these fonts are not packaged in Fedora (or if they were but have been
> retired), new packages will need to be made and reviewed first. Note: I am
> not volunteering for this task, because I have more than enough on my plate
> at the moment without picking up three new font packages.
>
> ~spot
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 10:22 PM Anirban Mitra <mitradranirban(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am the developer of Open source OpenType fonts Ani, Mitramono, and
>> MuktiNarrow. My fonts are part of Fedora/Redhat distribution since 2003.
>> Since then I have upgraded my fonts and bugfixed them. However newer
>> versions were not included in Fedora. The fonts are currently hosted in
>> https://github.com/mitradranirban/fonts-fbf-beng and
>> https://github.com/mitradranirban/fonts-mukti. How can the newer and
>> better versions be a part of Fedora distribution?
>> _______________________________________________
>> fonts mailing list -- fonts(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>
>
I am the developer of Open source OpenType fonts Ani, Mitramono, and
MuktiNarrow. My fonts are part of Fedora/Redhat distribution since 2003.
Since then I have upgraded my fonts and bugfixed them. However newer
versions were not included in Fedora. The fonts are currently hosted in
https://github.com/mitradranirban/fonts-fbf-beng and
https://github.com/mitradranirban/fonts-mukti. How can the newer and better
versions be a part of Fedora distribution?