I have filed a review request for inclusion of fbf-mukti-fonts (which
were earlier part of font-bengali package as MuktiNarrow
Hope to get sponsor when approved.
Thanks
Anirban
On 30/01/2022, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I can't find it as a retired package in dist-git... it was
probably too
long
ago. I would suggest just going through the regular process for a new
package.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 07:35:57AM +0530, Anirban Mitra wrote:
> Yes, my fonts are distributed under GPL3 with font exception. MuktiNarrow
> was part of Fedora from 2003 to 2006. It was later retired as font
> exception clause was not there in font licence. Version 1.99 and 2.1 was
> distributed under GPL2+ font exception and current version of Mukti font
> is
> distributed under GPL3+ font exception.
> Thanks
> Anirban
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2022, 3:47 am Matthew Miller, <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Probably! Is your font under an open source license?
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 05:27:03AM +0530, Anirban Mitra wrote:
> > > If I want to package and submit my font for consideration for
> > > inclusion
> > by
> > > Fedora, can I do it?
> > > -Anir
> > >
> > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, 10:58 pm Tom Callaway, <spotrh(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > > Normally, this would be as simple as updating the font packages to
> > > > use
> > the
> > > > newer versions of the fonts, but I cannot see any font packages in
> > Fedora
> > > > which include these fonts (Ani, Mitramono, MuktiNarrow).
> > > >
> > > > If these fonts are not packaged in Fedora (or if they were but have
> > been
> > > > retired), new packages will need to be made and reviewed first.
> > > > Note:
> > I am
> > > > not volunteering for this task, because I have more than enough on
> > > > my
> > plate
> > > > at the moment without picking up three new font packages.
> > > >
> > > > ~spot
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 10:22 PM Anirban Mitra <
> > mitradranirban(a)gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I am the developer of Open source OpenType fonts Ani, Mitramono,
> > > >> and
> > > >> MuktiNarrow. My fonts are part of Fedora/Redhat distribution
since
> > 2003.
> > > >> Since then I have upgraded my fonts and bugfixed them. However
> > > >> newer
> > > >> versions were not included in Fedora. The fonts are currently
> > > >> hosted
> > in
> > > >>
https://github.com/mitradranirban/fonts-fbf-beng and
> > > >>
https://github.com/mitradranirban/fonts-mukti. How can the newer
> > > >> and
> > > >> better versions be a part of Fedora distribution?
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> fonts mailing list -- fonts(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> To unsubscribe send an email to
> > > >> fonts-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > > >>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > >> List Guidelines:
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > >> List Archives:
> > > >>
> >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > > >>
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> > > >>
> > > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > fonts mailing list -- fonts(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to fonts-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> >
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines:
> > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/fonts@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> >
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Miller
> > <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> > Fedora Project Leader
> >
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader