Le Lun 26 novembre 2007 15:25, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit :
As you saw already, these are packaged as mgopen-fonts. The mgopen
project, however, does not seem to be making any progress beyond the
first release of the fonts.
Same thing as what happened to Vera. The various people wanting to
make the fonts evolve need to agree on a new FLOSS upstream like it
happened to DejaVu. IMHO we should not package all the MGOpen
derivatives before a clear new upstream emerges.
> GFS Didot
> GFS Bodoni
> GFS Neohellenic
> GFS Artemisia
> GFS Theokritos
> GFS Olga
> GFS Didot Classic
> GFS Porson
> GFS Baskerville
> GFS Bodoni Classic
> GFS Gazis
> GFS Solomos
> GFS Porson
> GFS Complutum
I plan to package the above some time if noone beats me to it.
Already done but now the packages await review (half of them at least).
When the
tetex->TeXLive dust settles, I plan to also package the TeX-related
bindings.
If you know tex please do Computer Modern Unicode - he's stuck waiting
for someone that understands tex to write a specfile that allows
building it from Fedora TEX in Fedora fontforge.
A side question: Does anyone have experience about packaging the
same
font both for X11 and TeX? Do I need to include the same font files
twice? Create soft/hard links for efficiency? Require one (X11) for
the other (TeX)?
As I already answered bitmap and core X11 fonts users : the wiki is
open for new guidelines, as long as they respect our general packaging
policy
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Packaging/Policy
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot