Hi all, I haven't been too active on the SIG lately for lack of free time. However others (who rock) have been busy working on fonts packages, so here is a long delayed status update that will try to clear the backlog: ▪▪ General status — We have 56 entries in the wishlist. Even counting entries the packager forgot to recategorize (grrr) I think the wishlist is still growing faster than we package fonts. More active packagers are obviously needed. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Font_wishlist — We have 58 entries in the packaged list. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Packaged_fonts It is still nicely growing, and Fedora 9 level reviews like this one are already obsolete http://www.advogato.org/person/yosch/diary.html?start=4 — We've created 55 new packages since the start of the cycle (a wishlist entry can translate in several packages). That's pretty awesome and way past the 32 packages mark of the last report (and way past previous Fedora cycle accomplishments). Special kuddos to Dennis Jang for packaging the huge UN Korean font set (though he needs to update his wiki pages). Others didn't attain the level of awesomeness of Dennis but still did pretty well. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_inclusion_history ▪▪ Package status ▪▪▪ Packaged, with bugs still open: — sportrop-fonts, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 — asana-math-fonts, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 — icelandic-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 ⇒ Packagers please close your review bugs when the packaging is finished. ▪▪▪ Packaged, but not referenced in Fedora 10 comps — myanmar3-unicode-fonts That was short :) most packagers seem to apply http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Comps_fonts_rules without prodding on my part. Good job and please fix this one. ▪▪▪ Packaged, with wiki page not finalized or missing — thibault-fonts-essays1743, — thibault-fonts-isabella, — thibault-fonts-rockets, — thibault-fonts-staypuft, — un-fonts, — un-extra-fonts, — icelandic-fonts — smc-fonts – darkgarden-fonts – sportrop-fonts — myanmar3-unicode-fonts ⇒ Please make sure each font package has a completed wiki page (Packaged fonts category) that can be used by the docs team in release notes and other documents ▪▪▪ Reviewed fonts waiting for packager action — bitstream-vera-fonts (old FE-MERGE ticket, needs someone to help Behdad co-maintain the package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 — sil-gentium-basic-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 — hiran-perizia-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 — cf-bonveno-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 — arabeyes-thabit-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 — arabeyes-mothana-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 — alee-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 — hiran-rufscript-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 ⇒ You know what you need to do ▪▪▪ Approved fonts not pushed yet — unikurd-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 ▪▪▪ Waiting for a reviewer — heuristica-fonts (just cleared by FE-LEGAL) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 — oldstandard-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 (not an easy font to package and not baked yet IMHO. I put some comments in the bug but didn't start formal review, so this one is still open) ⇒ We need some reviewers. I can't review every single font package out there (especially since I'm not allowed to review my own). In other news more interesting material was added to the SIG wiki and a guideline change on fontconfig file location is still proceeding. And the big F11 package renaming is still planned, I just don't have the energy left to write about it. I hope you liked this report. It took a lot of work to be written. If you want some changes in the next edition, just ping me. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot