rawhide build currently broken
by Florian Weimer
The i686 build fails with:
gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o
/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/librtld.os
'-Wl,-('
/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/dl-allobjs.os
/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/rtld-libc.a
-lgcc '-Wl,-)' \
-Wl,-Map,/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/librtld.os.map
gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -shared -o
/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/ld.so.new
\
-Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-z,defs
-Wl,-z,now \
/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/librtld.os
-Wl,--version-script=/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/ld.map
\
-Wl,-soname=ld-linux.so.2 \
-Wl,-defsym=_begin=0
/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/librtld.os:
In function `getenv':
/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/stdlib/getenv.c:84:
undefined reference to `strncmp'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [Makefile:460:
/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/ld.so]
Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/elf'
I can reproduce it upstream with this configure invocation:
../git/configure --prefix=/usr CC="gcc -m32" CFLAGS="-O3 -g" CXX="g++
-m32" CXXFLAGS="-O3" --enable-tunables --enable-stack-protector=strong
--build=i686-linux
I believe it was introduced by the tunables changes.
Unfortunately, I probably won't have a chance to fix this until 2017-01-04.
Thanks,
Florian
7 years, 3 months
Re: Will glibc 2.24.90 go to Fedora 25?
by Florian Weimer
On 01/05/2017 02:51 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 5.1.2017 14:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 01/05/2017 02:46 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to know if glibc 2.24.90 (or newer) will ever be pushed down to
>>> Fedora 25 or even 24.
>>>
>>> Juts to be clear: I'm not asking you to do it, I just want to know.
>>
>> No, Fedora 25 and 24 are stuck at 2.24 and 2.23, with backports as
>> needed.
> Thanks.
>>
>> Why do you ask? Do you need a specific feature?
> On the contrary, I was making sure this bug [0] will only need patches
> in rawhide.
>
> [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410175
Ah, right. This only needs to be fixed in rawhide.
Thanks,
Florian
7 years, 3 months
Fwd: Re: Will glibc 2.24.90 go to Fedora 25?
by Florian Weimer
FYI.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Will glibc 2.24.90 go to Fedora 25?
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:48:09 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com>
To: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com>, glibc(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: Tomas Orsava <torsava(a)redhat.com>
On 01/05/2017 02:46 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if glibc 2.24.90 (or newer) will ever be pushed down to
> Fedora 25 or even 24.
>
> Juts to be clear: I'm not asking you to do it, I just want to know.
No, Fedora 25 and 24 are stuck at 2.24 and 2.23, with backports as needed.
Why do you ask? Do you need a specific feature?
Thanks,
Florian
7 years, 3 months
