August 2020 - golang - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #2: EPEL availability

by Nicolas Mailhot

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` The macro code needs massaging to also work on EPEL. Most of the work is spec side since some of the macros are going to collide with the ones provided by previous iterations of Go macro packages `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/2

3 weeks

2
4
0 / 0

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #3: %goprep should apply patches automatically

by Nicolas Mailhot

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` `%goprep` should apply patches automatically, so there is no convenience gap with `%autosetup`. This is generic work that should be done *redhat-rpm-config* side in forge macros and then reused in`%goprep`. Basically: 1. define a `patch_flags<suffix>` rpm variable holding the parameters that should be passed to `%patch<suffix>` 2. define a `default_flags<suffix>` fallback 3. define a `source_patches<suffix>` holding an ordered space separated list of patch suffixes associated with a particular forge/go source. And then write the usual lua loops to apply it all at the right moment in the spec. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/3

3 weeks

6
9
0 / 0

[go-rpm-macros] PR #20: Use --with-tests when running checks also.

by Elliott Sales de Andrade

qulogic opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Use --with-tests when running checks also. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/20

2 years, 7 months

1
2
0 / 0

[go-rpm-macros] PR #23: macros: Accept options for %gotest

by Alexander Todorov

atodorov opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` macros: Accept options for %gotest `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/23

2 years, 10 months

4
7
0 / 0

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #25: Consider using -trimpath

by Debarshi Ray

rishi reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` See [this](https://github.com/containers/toolbox/pull/448) [Toolbox](https://github.com/containers/toolbox) discussion for context. It might be good to include `-trimpath` in `%gobuild` and `%gobuildflags`. Apparently Arch Linux already uses it. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/25

2 years, 11 months

4
9
0 / 0

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #19: LDFlags Macro Typos

by Brian Exelbierd (bex)

bex reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` While working with a new package, I needed some LDFlags passed. I am using this construction in my spec: ``` %build LDFLAGS="-X foo=bar " %gobuild ... ``` I have to put the space in quotes at the end as we appear to have space expansion errors. I was talking to @ignatenkobrain and he pointed out: * https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/rpm/macros.d/macros.go-rpm#... there is a missing space * https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/rpm/macros.d/macros.go-comp... ${LDFLAGS:-%{?currentgoldflags}} ← should be like that `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/19

3 years

3
4
0 / 0

[go-rpm-macros] PR #26: Remove tildes from goname

by Benjamin Lowry

blowry opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Remove tildes from goname `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/26

3 years

6
13
0 / 0

[go-rpm-macros] PR #21: Expose Go build flags directly to spec files as a macro

by Daniel P. Berrange

berrange opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Expose Go build flags directly to spec files as a macro `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/21

3 years, 6 months

5
10
0 / 0

Go rpm macroses in rhel8 and epel

by Denis Fateyev

Hello all, Originally posted to go-sig@, but haven't got any answer, maybe here will be better luck. I have recently tried to rebuild some Golang modules packages against epel8, and found out that there were build issues at "%goprep". Could anybody provide some more info: are Go rpm macroses not fully backported to RHEL8 currently? Any kind of blockers, perhaps? -- wbr, Denis.

3 years, 7 months

3
5
0 / 0

RPM error: following noarch package built differently on different architectures

by Germano Massullo

Good day everybody. As some from #fedora-golang channel may know, Fabian Affolter and I, we are releasing for the first time Bettercap to Fedora repository. By the way we are getting this build error and we have no idea about how to fix it FAILED: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures: golang-github-bettercap-devel-2.28-4.fc34.noarch.rpm Since the problem seemed to be s390x architecture, we tried using "ExcludeArch: s390x" but it did not work. What should we do? If you want, feel free to use your proven packager super powers to fix it Thank you for your time

3 years, 7 months

4
4
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang August 2020