haskell-devel December 2008

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
49 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] New: ghci does not handle backspace correctly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '09

29 Jan '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghci does not handle backspace correctly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 Summary: ghci does not handle backspace correctly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ghc AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com ReportedBy: greenrd(a)greenrd.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ghci does not handle the backspace key correctly. Presumably this is because ghc is not (according to ldd) linked with either readline or editline. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-6.10.1-6.fc11.i386 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ghci 2. Type something 3. Press backspace Actual results: ^? appears Expected results: character deleted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #40 from Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> 2008-12-23 15:22:39 EDT --- Also there is a changelog entry missing for 1.4.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #39 from Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> 2008-12-23 15:18:26 EDT --- %preun and %post use undefined macros: %ghc_postinst_script instead of %ghc_register_pkg %ghc_preun_script instead of if [ "$1" -eq 0 ] ; then %ghc_unregister_pkg fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-12-23 13:53:41 EDT --- My advice would be to simply not attempt multiple library versions. If you find yourself in a case where you have to maintain something backrevved, you're already lost to a certain degree. This package looks fine to me. rpmlint says: ghc-HTTP.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/HTTP-3001.1.5/libHSHTTP-3001.1.5.a ghc-HTTP-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-HTTP-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/HTTP-3001.1.5/libHSHTTP-3001.1.5_p.a which are all normal for Haskell packages. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: e34d9f979bafbbf2e45bf90a9ee9bfd291f3c67c291a250cc0a6378431578aeb HTTP-3001.1.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-HTTP-devel = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-HTTP = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-HTTP(x86-64) = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 = /bin/sh ghc = 6.10.1 ghc-HTTP-prof-3001.1.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-HTTP-prof = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-HTTP-prof(x86-64) = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 = ghc-HTTP = 3001.1.5-1.fc11 ghc-prof = 6.10.1 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets OK (ghc package registration and documentation indexing) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-22 23:32:14 EDT --- Thanks Jason - sorry was too busy last week to update. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Dec 23 2008 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> - 3001.1.5-1 - update to 3001.1.5 - use bcond for doc and prof - minor tweaks for latest packaging guidelines (A little comment: this package is no longer the latest version, but 4000.0.0 seems to be too new for the current release of cabal-install - I am not quite sure how we can deal with multiple library versions inside Fedora, but it may be a problem we have to face at some point. Though hopefully the coming Haskell (library) Platform will help with this kind for basic packages like this one.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-22 20:55:17 EDT --- Package imported and built ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-2.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Dec '08

23 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-22 20:33:40 EDT --- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #38 from Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> 2008-12-22 06:51:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > Ok thank you very much that looks very useful: it is quite a bit change to our > packaging so I think I would like to leave the automatic dependency scripts for > the next update of the guidelines after this one, if that is ok - that will > give us a bit more time to test and play with them. Sure. > Presumbly ghc should own those scripts? Yes or maybe better in a separate small package that is required by ghc to make it easier to update them. > > I am not yet sure, what the impact of > > %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 > > is for ghc packages. > > Naive question: what would be the consequence of leaving > _use_internal_dependency_generator turned on? Turning off also disables all C > library dependency checking? Anyway from what you say we can tweak the scripts > to do the write thing. If it is turned on, then __find_requires is not used. According to this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependenci… instead of rpmdeps maybe /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires should be used. I will ask about this on fedora-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ghc |ghc-gtk2hs --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-22 02:16:50 EDT --- Will leave this open until it is fixed for f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-12-22 00:38:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review. :) I will improvement the description of the package when importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-paths Short Description: Interface to ghc's install directories Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel December 2008