haskell-devel October 2011

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
295 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 736368] Review Request: ghc-shakespeare - Haskell compile-time templating library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736368 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 662283] Review Request: hledger-web - A hledger add-on command providing a web interface

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662283 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-10-02 21:33:48 EDT --- Just noting that the latest 0.16 release now works with the newest yesod-0.9.2.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 736602] Review Request: ghc-wai - Web Application Interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

12 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 736602] Review Request: ghc-wai - Web Application Interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736602 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-10-02 21:21:49 EDT --- Thank you for reviewing. :) New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-wai Short Description: Web Application Interface library Owners: petersen Branches: f16 f15 f14 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 736602] Review Request: ghc-wai - Web Application Interface library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736602 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-02 08:46:08 EDT --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-wai-0.4.2-1.fc17.src.rpm ghc-wai-devel-0.4.2-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm ghc-wai-0.4.2-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm ../ghc-wai.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. License is BSD 2 clause. [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. LICENSE file is included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum wai-0.4.2.tar.gz 3b1b56ba80e4c6328ec7c6209bb2915f wai-0.4.2.tar.gz d5sum ghc-wai-0.4.2-1.fc15.src/wai-0.4.2.tar.gz 3b1b56ba80e4c6328ec7c6209bb2915f ghc-wai-0.4.2-1.fc15.src/wai-0.4.2.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on x86_64 and x86. [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro [NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Checked with rpmquery --list [NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [+]MUST: A package must own ll directories that it creates. Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Checked with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [NA]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} pm -e ghc-wai error: Failed dependencies: ghc(wai-0.4.2) = 4b36963ef91b4a4adab343315ef116b6 is needed by (installed) ghc-wai-devel-0.4.2-1.fc15.x86_64 ghc-wai = 0.4.2-1.fc15 is needed by (installed) ghc-wai-devel-0.4.2-1.fc15.x86_64 [NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed the package. Installs fine. Loaded Network.Wai into ghci. Loads fine. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPRORVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

← Newer
1
...
27
28
29
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel October 2011