https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303
Bug 630303 depends on bug 630295, which changed state.
Bug 630295 Summary: Review Request: ghc-web-routes-quasi - Data types and functions for web-routes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630295
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630295
Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed| |2012-07-21 13:34:01
--- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> ---
No reverse deps anymore. Last update in Jan 2012. Closing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831092
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
No need to request f18 currently, it's devel at this point.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831092
Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING
Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> ---
Thanks for the review.
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: ghc-readline
Short Description: A Haskell interface to the GNU readline library
Owners: shakthimaan
Branches: f16 f17 f18
InitialCC: haskell-sig
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831092
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i ghc-readline-1.0.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm
ghc-readline-1.0.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
ghc-readline-devel-1.0.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm ../ghc-readline.spec
ghc-readline.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US csh -> sch, cs, ch
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-readline.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US csh -> sch, cs, ch
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-readline-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US csh -> sch,
cs, ch
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
GPLv2
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE file is included.
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
md5sum readline-1.0.1.0.tar.gz
eade9576def53ed293628a2f8580007e readline-1.0.1.0.tar.gz
md5sum readline-1.0.1.0.tar.gz
eade9576def53ed293628a2f8580007e readline-1.0.1.0.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on x86_64.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
Checked with ls -lR
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
Checked with rpm -e ghc-readline.
[+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Should items
[+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
Installed the packages. Loaded System.Console.Readline into ghci. Loads fine.
[+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
cabal2spec-diff is OK.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662275
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2012-07-20 22:56:39
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
hledger-0.17-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-cmdargs-0.8 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730542
Summary: ghc-cmdargs-0.8 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-cmdargs
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.8
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.7
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cmdargs/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788030
Bug 788030 depends on bug 783417, which changed state.
Bug 783417 Summary: drop ghc-neither?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783417
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-neither-0.3.0.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783417
Summary: ghc-neither-0.3.0.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ghc-neither
AssignedTo: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: mathstuf(a)gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.3.0.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.3.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/neither/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648099
Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed| |2012-07-20 22:07:22
--- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> ---
Upstream marked this as obsolete. Closing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648095
Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed| |2012-07-20 22:06:44
--- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> ---
The tls package is recommended as the replacement for this package. Closing (we
should urge upstreams that still use this to move to tls since upstream
recommends it instead).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630267
Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG
--- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> ---
Upstream has marked this as obsolete. Changing to NOTABUG.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630267
Bug 630267 depends on bug 630258, which changed state.
Bug 630258 Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-object - Represent hierarchical structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630258
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630258
Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed| |2012-07-20 22:03:20
--- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> ---
Upstream has marked this as obsolete (aeson is the replacement). Closing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630267
Bug 630267 depends on bug 630227, which changed state.
Bug 630227 Summary: Review Request: ghc-convertible-text - Typeclasses and instances for converting between types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630227
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630227
Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Flags|needinfo?(mathstuf(a)gmail.co |
|m) |
Last Closed| |2012-07-20 22:01:31
--- Comment #15 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> ---
This is marked as obsolete on Hackage. Closing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841746
Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap
| |roject.org
--- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> ---
$ rpmlint ghc-arrows.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint ghc-arrows-0.4.4.0-1.fc16.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint ghc-arrows-0.4.4.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint ghc-arrows-devel-0.4.4.0-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Successful Koji builds for F16, F17 and F18 respectively:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4274656http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4274659http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4274660
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831123
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
ghc-lambdabot-utils-4.2.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834986
Bug ID: 834986
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
Assignee: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
Summary: leksah-0.12.1.3 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: leksah
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 0.12.1.3
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.12.1.2
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/leksah/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831123
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2012-07-17 13:24:33
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
ghc-lambdabot-utils-4.2.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830155
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
unlambda-0.1-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833359
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
ghc-Stream-0.4.6-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833359
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2012-07-17 13:18:29
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
ghc-Stream-0.4.6-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838771
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828735
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828735
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839902
Bug ID: 839902
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
konrad(a)tylerc.org
Assignee: konrad(a)tylerc.org
Summary: hlint-1.8.30 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: hlint
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.8.30
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.8.29
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hlint/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839895
Bug ID: 839895
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
konrad(a)tylerc.org
Assignee: konrad(a)tylerc.org
Summary: cpphs-1.14 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: cpphs
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.14
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.13.3
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cpphs/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836609
Bug ID: 836609
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Summary: pandoc-1.9.4.2 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: pandoc
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.9.4.2
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.9.4.1
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pandoc/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Agda-2.3.0.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742882
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630260
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831092
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630260
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: ghc-attoparsec
New Branches: el6
Owners: mathstuf petersen
InitialCC: haskell-sig
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742882
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
We need semigroups to build conduit for EPEL6.
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: ghc-semigroups
New Branches: el6
Owners: narasim petersen
InitialCC: haskell-sig
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|VERIFIED |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839473
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |llvm-3.1-7.fc18
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed| |2012-07-14 13:33:28
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839473
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This is the build
> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=959567
I successfully tested it on armv5tel and it fixes the ghc segfaults
so looks good to me (tested both hello.hs and building the hscolour
package in mock).
I can try to test armv7hl later using the koji static repo
(the arm rawhide seems to have some perl breakage today.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whiteboard|Ready |
Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Thank you for reviewing.
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: Agda
Short Description: Dependently typed functional language commandline
Owners: petersen
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC: haskell-sig
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: pandoc-1.9.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810478
Summary: pandoc-1.9.2 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: pandoc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Latest upstream release: 1.9.2
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.9.1.2
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pandoc/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |VERIFIED
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
==== Generic ====
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: The package did not built BR could therefore not be checked or the
package failed to build because of missing BR
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
/home/shaks/710383/Agda-executable-2.3.0.1.tar.gz :
MD5SUM this package : a9c803f0a829cf54d35b1a82f0ba6181
MD5SUM upstream package : a9c803f0a829cf54d35b1a82f0ba6181
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
Generated by fedora-review 0.1.3
External plugins:
Package approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839473
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Thanks Peter for working on this. I will try to test your build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839473
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Just to confirm: reverting to llvm-3.0-13.fc18 fixes the ARM segfaults.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839473
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|llvm-3.1 missing ghc ARM |llvm-3.1 missing ghc ARM
|support |support: causing all
| |compiled programs to
| |segfault
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839473
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap
| |roject.org,
| |pbrobinson(a)gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
I see Debian has an "agda" meta-package that pulls in Agda-executable,
Agda and the stdlib.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839260
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
A simple usage example:
$ ls -l stdlib
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 petersen petersen 23 Jul 11 15:46 stdlib ->
/usr/lib64/Agda-stdlib/
$ cat test.agda
module test where
open import IO
main = run (putStrLn "Hello world!")
$ agda -c -i. -istdlib test.agda
:
:
[91 of 91] Compiling MAlonzo.Code.Qtest (
/home/petersen/pkgreview/Agda/test/MAlonzo/Code/Qtest.hs,
/home/petersen/pkgreview/Agda/test/MAlonzo/Code/Qtest.o )
$ ./test
Hello world!
$
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
A small example of usage:
$ cat test.agda
module test where
data Bool : Set where
true : Bool
false : Bool
$ agda test.agda
Checking test (/home/petersen/pkgreview/Agda/test/test.agda).
Finished test.
$
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839260
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |Agda-stdlib
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839260
Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |shakthimaan(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |shakthimaan(a)gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839260
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap
| |roject.org
Depends On| |710383 (Agda)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |839260
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839152
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |DEFERRED
Last Closed| |2012-07-11 05:11:56
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Actually this only needed for Agda-stdlib development I think, to
generate "Everything" but it is also generated in the src tarball.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839152
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap
| |roject.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710383
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Yeah it would be good to add the stdlib too.
I have a draft package of it though Agda doesn't have proper
packaging conventions yet.
Actually Agda is needed to compile stdlib (at least to generate
the interface files) so I think this package will still
come before Agda-stdlib even if it is not very useful without it.
Also I verified that Agda doesn't seem to need ghc-Agda-devel:
it is dynamically linked to ghc-Agda anyway.
I think the example above does not compile with Agda-2.3?
but the example from
http://strugglingthroughproblems.blogspot.in/2012/03/agda-as-programming-la…
you found might with stdlib-0.6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662275
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
hledger-0.17-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259
--- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
git-annex-3.20120522-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2012-07-10 16:49:12
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
git-annex-3.20120522-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817346
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
ghc-hamlet-1.0.1.3-1.fc17, ghc-shakespeare-1.0.0.2-1.fc17,
ghc-hakyll-3.2.7.2-4.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.