[Bug 828789] Review Request: ghc-oeis - Interface to the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828789
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-oeis.spec
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - Not OK, requires better summary and
description
API documentation - OK
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
BSD
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE file is included.
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
sha256sum oeis-0.3.1.tar.gz
829308a22e330bef8e39a8fa88776488eba6213b1bd90cf70168811f5611ba4f
oeis-0.3.1.tar.gz
sha256sum ghc-oeis-0.3.1-1.fc16.src/oeis-0.3.1.tar.gz
829308a22e330bef8e39a8fa88776488eba6213b1bd90cf70168811f5611ba4f
ghc-oeis-0.3.1-1.fc16.src/oeis-0.3.1.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on x86_64.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides.
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
Installed the packages. Checked with ls -lR
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
pm -e ghc-oeis
error: Failed dependencies:
ghc(oeis-0.3.1) = cb2a9dd055fa16e38a914bfb2adc859b is needed by (installed)
ghc-oeis-devel-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64
ghc-oeis = 0.3.1-1.fc15 is needed by (installed)
ghc-oeis-devel-0.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64
[NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section
[+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Should items
[-]SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should
contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
Loaded Math.OEIS into ghci. Loads fine.
[+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is
vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity.
cabal2spec-diff is OK.
Please fix summary and description.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 8 months
[Bug 833356] Review Request: ghc-data-inttrie - A simple lazy, infinite trie from integers
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833356
Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> ---
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
ghc-data-inttrie.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) trie -> tire, true, tie
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trie -> tire,
true, tie
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> eh, e, g
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US foldr -> fold,
folder, folds
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) trie -> tire, true,
tie
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trie -> tire,
true, tie
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg -> eh, e, g
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US foldr -> fold,
folder, folds
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-data-inttrie-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) trie -> tire,
true, tie
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trie ->
tire, true, tie
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eg ->
eh, e, g
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-data-inttrie-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US foldr ->
fold, folder, folds
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings.
[+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Naming-Yes
Version-release - Matches
License - OK, BSD
No prebuilt external bits - OK
Spec legibity - OK
Package template - OK
Arch support - OK
Libexecdir - OK
rpmlint - yes
changelogs - OK
Source url tag - OK, validated.
Build Requires list - OK
Summary and description - OK
API documentation - OK, in devel package
[+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
The package has only one source file which mentions the license to be BSD. Also
.cabal file's license field is BSD.
[+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
LICENSE file is not included. Packager has requested upstream to include it
[+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
sha256sum data-inttrie-0.0.7.tar.gz
37828f696c966ad4b6b7f533bb348e77b5dcbdf9e9c69973bc68c82bae41a5a5
data-inttrie-0.0.7.tar.gz
sha256sum ghc-data-inttrie-0.0.7-1.fc16.src/data-inttrie-0.0.7.tar.gz
37828f696c966ad4b6b7f533bb348e77b5dcbdf9e9c69973bc68c82bae41a5a5
ghc-data-inttrie-0.0.7-1.fc16.src/data-inttrie-0.0.7.tar.gz
[+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Built on x86_64.
[+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Checked with rpmquery --list.
[+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
Checked with rpmquery --whatprovides
[+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
Installed the packages. Checked with ls -lR.
[+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release}
rpm -e ghc-data-inttrie
error: Failed dependencies:
ghc(data-inttrie-0.0.7) = c8a8e017f537134057476291d71af67a is needed by
(installed) ghc-data-inttrie-devel-0.0.7-1.fc15.x86_64
ghc-data-inttrie = 0.0.7-1.fc15 is needed by (installed)
ghc-data-inttrie-devel-0.0.7-1.fc15.x86_64
[+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Should items
[+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-]SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should
contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+]SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
Built on x86 and x86_64.
[+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
Loaded Data.IntTrie into ghci. Loads fine.
[+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is
vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity.
cabal2spec-diff is OK.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 8 months