[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712284] New: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad
Alias: ghc-hint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712284
Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides
interpreter monad
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 712280
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint-0.3.3.2-1.fc14.s...
rpmlint output:
ghc-hint-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hint-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/hint-0.3.3.2/libHShint-0.3.3.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years
[Bug 907515] New: ghc 7.4.1 and 7.4.2 compile a correct gtk2hs program such that it crashes with a segmentation fault
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907515
Bug ID: 907515
Summary: ghc 7.4.1 and 7.4.2 compile a correct gtk2hs program
such that it crashes with a segmentation fault
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: ghc
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: garrett.mitchener(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:
I wrote a Haskell program using gtk2hs. It works fine on Fedora 17 under ghc
7.0.4. However it crashes with a segmentation fault when compiled on Fedora 18
or rawhide(19). The crash occurs the first time an action added to the gtk
loop with timeoutAddFull runs.
I wrote a minimal test case that triggers the problem and posted it here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629
It seems to be a compiler or run-time-system bug in ghc 7.4.1 and 7.4.2 or
possibly gtk2hs, because the binary built on F18 or rawhide crashes when run on
F17, and the binary built on F17 runs without a problem on F18.
Furthermore, if I disable selinux on the kernel command line at boot time, the
crash vanishes in F18 and rawhide. I don't know why-- the crash doesn't
trigger any selinux error messages, just a segmentation fault.
Jens Petersen reported to me that the crash does not occur on 64 bit test
machines on Fedora 18, but he confirmed that it does occur on 32 bit test
machines.
I've run into pointer alignment problems with ghc before, where alignment
pragmas in C modules are somehow broken when the C module is linked with a ghc
program, so that may be the case here?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc 7.4.1 and
7.4.2.
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
Compile and run the test program posted in the haskell.org trac bug report
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629
I'm also posting the bug here in case someone else runs into it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VZ6WAcNDc9&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 1 month
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664205] New: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
Alias: ghc-dlist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205
Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that
provides difference lists
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist-0.5-1.fc14....
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist.spec?attred...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-dlist.spec
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 2 months
[Bug 880135] New: Compile GHC packages with -O2
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880135
Bug ID: 880135
Summary: Compile GHC packages with -O2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: ghc-rpm-macros
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: dag.odenhall(a)gmail.com
Problem:
If you want to compile your Haskell application with -O2, only parts of it will
be - most system packages are already built with -O1. All your own code is
going to link to those prebuilt binaries.
Does it matter?
Respectable people in the community claim -O2 really does produce better code:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11108746/difference-between-ghcs-o-and-o2
Cons:
The fedora packages will take longer to build.
Counter argument:
This shouldn't happen often though, and I guess is done by some build service
[koji?]. Users will just install prebuilt packages with no compilation time at
all and benefit from optimized binaries.
Footnote:
This is only about building the fedora packages with -O2. Our cabal-install
package should not be changed to default to -O2 for user compilation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 911725] New: ghc-ghc-devel not required?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911725
Bug ID: 911725
Summary: ghc-ghc-devel not required?
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: ghc
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: vadie.developer(a)gmail.com
Created attachment 697959
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=697959&action=edit
script used to measure size of the package installed,although one could see it
through packagekit
Description of problem:
I am the culprit for this bloat problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750317
ghc-ghc-devel is for hacking on ghc, it is the entir ghc platform(compiler,RTS
etc as a library). This pacakge should not be part of base install
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-7.4.1
this package takes up too much space (~ 240 MB installed)
and 34 MB
puts considerable strain on bandwidth and diskspace (OK not so much on
diskspace,but would be nice to get rid of it)
How reproducible:
just install ghc, 'yum install ghc'
Steps to Reproduce:
1.yum install ghc
2.say yes
3.
Actual results:
installs static library of entire ghc, which is not required for those
Expected results:
should not install ghc-ghc-devel package as part of base install.
Additional info:
This bug, is due to another request by me regarding quickCheck. Bug 750317
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750317
*note the title changed*
This is what Jens wrote : "
> Maybe we really want the ghc base package to be a meta package
> that pulls in "everything" to make the initial install friendlier
> for newcomers.
Ok, ghc-7.0.4-36.fc17 should provide a base metapackage
which installs all of ghc (ghc-compiler and ghc-devel).
So in future if you install ghc you will have a working
QuickCheck, etc out of the box.
"
I should have said no to it at that time itself, but i was not very
well-informed (not that I am now, just less ignorant),by adding ghc-ghc-devel,
we have internals/implementation of ghc as static library not static/devel
packages of quickCheck,parsec etc. {I am pretty sure about this}
I think it is correct and OK (infact necessary) to provide, -devel packages by
default for libraries of haskell, like ghc-parsec and ghc-parsec-devel, ghc-xml
and ghc-xml-devl,ghc-pango and ghc-pango-devel etc.
but ghc-ghc-devel is going too far. Only those who hack on ghc need this
(specifically who want to hack on this particular version others will track and
program for latest git/darcs version).
I think, it is possible to make this change. no ghc-ghc-devel in base
install,but whenever one installs any other library corresponding -devel
packages should also be installed
I didn't realize about this space problem, untill I ran out of space on my old
Fedora 16 on my root partition, found out that ghc installation took ~530 MB
installed space.
I am not sure about ghc-compiler package though, anyone more experienced in
haskell packaging can chime in.
I think this thing, needs better testing and some discussion so no need to
hurry out the changes, so that we make sure we do the right thing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m5osKIWdlf&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 902850] New: Lock Screen does not work in xmonad-gnome session
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902850
Bug ID: 902850
Summary: Lock Screen does not work in xmonad-gnome session
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: xmonad
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: conan(a)irconan.co.uk
Description of problem:
When "Lock Screen" is selected in the xmonad-gnome session nothing happens.
Running "gnome-screensaver-command -l" in terminal produces no output.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Version: 0.10
Release: 17.fc18
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to xmonad-gnome session
2. Select "Lock Screen" from the menu in the top right corner.
Actual results:
Nothing
Expected results:
Lock screen appears
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IfYeZBiMZD&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 3 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 639787] New: build darcs for EPEL-6
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639787
Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: darcs
AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
SSIA: I think we should have darcs in EPEL-6.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 4 months
[Bug 957876] New: File 'ifluatex.sty' not found
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957876
Bug ID: 957876
Summary: File 'ifluatex.sty' not found
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: pandoc
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ejacobs(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, shakthimaan(a)gmail.com
Depends On: 861300
Category: ---
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #861300 +++
Description of problem:
When using pandoc on F18, I get:
File 'ifluatex.sty' not found
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.9.4.5-2.fc18
How reproducible:
Create a simple pandoc input.txt file. Try to convert it into a pdf using:
$ pandoc -t beamer input.txt -o input.pdf
Actual results:
pandoc: Error producing PDF from TeX source.
! LaTeX Error: File `ifluatex.sty' not found.
Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
Enter file name:
! Emergency stop.
<read *>
l.6 \usepackage
Expected results:
A pdf should be created
Additional info:
This does not appear to be fixed, even though it says it should be fixed in
861300
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2bLIE74yM6&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 4 months