haskell-devel May 2024

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
22 discussions

[Bug 715482] [RFE] support volume plugin via alsa-mixer?
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 May '24

30 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715482 Ben Boeckel <fedora(a)me.benboeckel.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Assignee|fedora(a)me.benboeckel.net |petersen(a)redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715482

1 0

[Bug 2262767] Review Request: ghc-config-value - Simple, layout-based value language similar to YAML or JSON
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 May '24

30 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262767 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #4) > Thanks, overall looks fine to me. > > The package complies with the packaging guidelines, builds and installs. > Spec file is generated with cabal-rpm. > > However the license file is MIT, but many of the source files say ISC > (except .cabal). > Could you confirm the license with the upstream maintainer, please? > (I know ISC and MIT are quite similar but we need to be precise in Fedora: > in the worst case we could possibly go with "MIT AND ISC" as workaround but > that feels wrong: > maybe ISC is more correct actually here by the looks of it.) Indeed: https://github.com/glguy/config-value/issues/13 So either add a link to this issue above the corrected License field, or update to the newer release if that comes out first and is compatible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262767 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2262772] Review Request: ghc-zenc - GHC style name Z-encoding and Z-decoding
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '24

28 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262772 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ URL|https://hackage.haskell.org |https://hackage.haskell.org |/package/%{pkg_name} |/package/zenc Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Looks fine to me The package complies with the packaging guidelines and installs. Spec file is generated with cabal-rpm. License is BSD3. Package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262772 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2262771] Review Request: ghc-versions - Types and parsers for software version numbers
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '24

28 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262771 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review+ URL|https://hackage.haskell.org |https://hackage.haskell.org |/package/%{pkg_name} |/package/versions Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- The package complies with the packaging guidelines and installs. Spec file is generated with cabal-rpm and looks fine to me. License is BSD3. You can try turning on the testsuite. Package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262771 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2262770] Review Request: ghc-s-cargot - A flexible, extensible s-expression library
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '24

28 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262770 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|https://hackage.haskell.org |https://hackage.haskell.org |/package/%{pkg_name} |/package/s-cargot Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review+ Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- The package complies with the packaging guidelines and installs. Spec file is generated with cabal-rpm and LGTM. License is BSD3. You could try enabling the testsuite. Package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262770 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2262769] Review Request: ghc-libBF - A binding to the libBF library
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '24

28 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262769 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST Flags| |fedora-review+ Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- The package complies with the packaging guidelines and installs. Spec file is generated with cabal-rpm and LGTM. License is MIT. Package APPROVED If you wish you could probably enable the testsuite for this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262769 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2262768] Review Request: ghc-deriving-compat - Backports of GHC deriving extensions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '24

28 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262768 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Just noting that the testsuite could perhaps be enabled (according to cabal-rpm), though I didn't try and its not a hard requirement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262768 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2262768] Review Request: ghc-deriving-compat - Backports of GHC deriving extensions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 May '24

28 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262768 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|https://hackage.haskell.org |https://hackage.haskell.org |/package/%{pkg_name} |/package/deriving-compat Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review+ Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- The package complies with the packaging guidelines and installs. Spec file is generated with cabal-rpm. License is BSD3. Package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262768 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2262767] Review Request: ghc-config-value - Simple, layout-based value language similar to YAML or JSON
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 May '24

27 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262767 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks, overall looks fine to me. The package complies with the packaging guidelines, builds and installs. Spec file is generated with cabal-rpm. However the license file is MIT, but many of the source files say ISC (except .cabal). Could you confirm the license with the upstream maintainer, please? (I know ISC and MIT are quite similar but we need to be precise in Fedora: in the worst case we could possibly go with "MIT AND ISC" as workaround but that feels wrong: maybe ISC is more correct actually here by the looks of it.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262767 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2262758] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-utils - Classes and data structures for working with data-kind indexed types
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 27 May '24

27 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262758 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com Status|NEW |POST Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- The package complies with the packaging guidelines and installs. Spec file is generated with cabal-rpm. License is BSD3. Package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262758 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel May 2024